>Although to keep our villians straight, wouldn't that have been Warner
>Brothers (I mean Time-Warner, I mean AOL-TimeWarner) doing the suing?
Quite right, Nathan - it musta been AOLTimeWarnerEMI. Sorry 'bout that,
chief.
>Heaven forbid we confuse the more subtle humor and satire of Bugs Bunny
>On Behalf Of Rob Schaap
>
> Nope. Absolutely true. The Tasmanian Trade Commission wanted to use a
> Tassie Devil as the graphic fulcrum of an expensively produced marketing
> strategy in 1998. Disney threatened legal action - on a critter
> that looks
> nothing like their fanciful version - a
