Re: RE: Re: Relative and absolute surplus value

2001-11-27 Thread Greg Schofield
OTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:04:30 -0800 Subject: [PEN-L:20027] RE: Re: Relative and absolute surplus value Greg Schofield writes: >... I would not be so free and easy with testing Marx's abstract essence o

RE: Re: Relative and absolute surplus value

2001-11-27 Thread Devine, James
Greg Schofield writes: >... I would not be so free and easy with testing Marx's abstract essence of capital against "empirical" evidence...< I wasn't "testing" Marx's theory. Instead, I was simply applying an abstract theory to the concrete reality (white-collar vs. blue-collar workers, etc.) As

Re: Re: RE: Relative and absolute surplus value

2001-11-26 Thread ALI KADRI
would that not be all relative in real time. --- Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Think of the working day of the working class as a > whole taken as a single > worker. > > Surplus value reflects the quantity of the working > day that goes to the > surplus. Absolute surplus value in

Re: RE: Relative and absolute surplus value

2001-11-26 Thread Michael Perelman
Think of the working day of the working class as a whole taken as a single worker. Surplus value reflects the quantity of the working day that goes to the surplus. Absolute surplus value increases by increasing the working day. Relative surplus value increases by decreasing to part of the workin