RE: Re: experimental economics

2000-10-02 Thread Forstater, Mathew
first, despite the problems with exper. stuff in general, the distinction between human and rat experiments is important. Vernon Smith, I believe, has never done rat experiments and does not endorse them. Kagel, et al. is the main source for rats. as far as Smith goes, one of the interesting th

Re: RE: Re: experimental economics

2000-10-02 Thread Jim Devine
At 03:01 PM 10/2/00 -0500, you wrote: >The next thing is that most of these experiments have rules that participants >MUST follow. This has a couple of implications. First, this limits the >relevance >of any results to cases where this holds (where people also must follow these >rules). Second,