-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 18:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:26130] Re: Re: gould dies at 60
>(Thus water after it is heated up gradually,
>suddenly begins to boil.
If you're going to show this book to
Let me rephrase Scott's question crudely: if Marx developed punctuated
equilibrium on his own and Gould was influenced by Marx, why would I possibly
need Gould to help me understand punctuated equilibrium?
This question makes me think of the difficulty that I sometimes encounter -- sort
of a meth
In a message dated 5/21/02 9:04:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Stephen Gould's is a great loss. He seems to have been an exceptional
> person in many ways. He certainly has enriched my understanding of
> economic processes, especially with his theory of the punctuat
- Original Message -
From: "Devine, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I loved Gould's work, especially his MISMEASURE OF MAN, a needed critique of
> IQ tests and the like. But I think though the theory of punctuated
> equilibrium is an important contribution to evolutionary theory, it isn't
>
Michael Perelman writes:
> Stephen Gould's is a great loss. He seems to have been an exceptional
> person in many ways. He certainly has enriched my understanding of
> economic processes, especially with his theory of the punctuated
> equilibrium.
I loved Gould's work, especially his MISMEASURE
