Re: RE: Re: odds turn further against US

2003-03-24 Thread k hanly
The problem is that these special interests as they are being served now will be primarily within the coalition of the willing. Conflict will be created with capital not in these sectors and also capital that is situated in areas that do not support the new american century project. The problem is

RE: Re: odds turn further against US

2003-03-24 Thread Devine, James
Ken writes:  > The costs of the war and occupation may become great enough that those who want further adventures full spectrum dominance and a new american century will lose power in the administration particularly if there are a significant number of personnel pouches and the economy conti

Re: Re: odds turn further against US

2003-03-24 Thread soula avramidis
  ' that there is a snowball's chance in hell ' snowball is the keyword, iran syria and jordan, the precarious others, and urban warfare, delays is what iran and syria want, and they will work to get it, how effective, do not know, but urban warfare and delays, a deadly combination for uncle sam, i

Re: Re: odds turn further against US

2003-03-24 Thread Moshe Pippik
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, k hanly wrote: > I really dont think that there is a snowball's chance in hell that the > US will be defeated on the battlefield or that they will stop short of > imposing their own chosen administration. When measuring sheer power against a smaller force it is obvious, in