Re: Re: Re: RE: thanks for the zillion references to Marx?(please check the lis

2000-12-01 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Date: Thursday, November 30, 2000 10:28 PMSubject: [PEN-L:5185] Re: Re: RE: thanks for the zillion references to Marx?(please check the lis .> >I yield to none in my admiration for Doug. Shall we ask him about his >passions? Doug

Re: Re: RE: thanks for the zillion references to Marx?(please check the lis

2000-11-30 Thread Justin Schwartz
.> >I yield to none in my admiration for Doug. Shall we ask him about his >passions? Doug's passions area  subject of burning interest. Justin is the same person as jks, i.e., me. You seem to be more interested in picking silly nits, like whether we can say "Marx is" rather than "Marx was"; p

Re: RE: thanks for the zillion references to Marx?(please check the lis

2000-11-30 Thread Colin Danby
Justin writes: > I don't "backpedal": I know a bit about philosophical empiricism, and can > also distinguish between what Hume called the strict and philosophical and > the loose and vulgar meanings of the term. I'm delighted to know how smart and well-educated you are, but I'm not interested i