Chris I owe you an apology. I looked up your references below to Hardt and
Negri and was genuinely surprised that I should be echoing their logic, in
passing I also read some other interesting points they raise.
What can I say except that they come at things from an angle which I find
strained
Please do not consider me in anyway with Hardt and Negri who's book I have
not read and from my browsing of it find little reason to ever do so. I
thought all I was stating was classic Historical Materialism as developed
by Lenin (on which we may well disagree without bringing in extraneous
as
Not only do we not see a single untied International Capitalist class;
in the U.S. at least we do not see a single united U.S. capitalist
class. To make a simple minded argument -- if capitalists were
completely united, we would already be in concentration camps.
Chris Burford wrote:
> At 26/
At 26/09/01 00:19 +0800, Greg wrote:
Was it not Lenin in Imperialism the Highest
Stage of Capitalism who noted the emergence of some then
"unstable" international cartels as precursors of the next
stage? I trust no one has missed the fact that this form of combine is
now both stable and plentiful
