RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-19 Thread Nicole Seibert
]] On Behalf Of Forstater, Mathew Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 5:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[PEN-L:8062] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Barkley- All very interesting. I know of Bordieu, but I admit I tried to start reading some of his stuff a few times and just

Re: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-19 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
e presumably the justification for seniority pay scales. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Nicole Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:03 AM Subject: [PEN-L:8282] RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Mat, I have res

Re: Re: Re: Re: Social Capital

2001-02-16 Thread Ken Hanly
Well I just object to what seemed outrageous abstract academic term slinging. I dont think it adds anything to a discussion, except to reflect the conspicuous production of signs significant only to some elite fraternity. This is not to say that abstractions and special terms cannot be useful. If

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Social Capital

2001-02-16 Thread ALI KADRI
Partly the reason for the jargon is that I do not think I am being original in saying what I am saying, and I think that some of your interpretation is better put in some respects. The thing is, I find it odd that the term social is arguable under capitalism. Maybe the next discussion will deal

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-15 Thread Forstater, Mathew
is the usefulness of the term here? -Original Message- From: J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:8116] Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Speaking of the evolution of terms, the word capital

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-15 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:18 AM Subject: [PEN-L:8131] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Formalist anthropologists like Schneider often note this derivation in arguing that cattle are 'wealth' in pastoralist communities like the Maasai. However, the only term in Maasai langu

Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-15 Thread Jim Devine
At 01:30 PM 2/15/01 -0500, you wrote: With regard to Putnam, who likes bowling leagues, bridge clubs, choral societies, and the like, I once heard him give a talk in which he declared that there is a better than 90% correlation between the level of memberships in choral societies in the 1870s in

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-15 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, February 15, 2001 1:54 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8139] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital At 01:30 PM 2/15/01 -0500, you wrote: With regard to Putnam, who likes bowling leagues, bridge clubs, choral societies, an

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-15 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
.c." and maybe correlated with broader social problems if they have conflicts with other groups, e.g. African Americans in Brooklyn. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, February 15, 2001 2:07 PM Subject:

RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-15 Thread Forstater, Mathew
although i participate in pen-l, i am also on another email list of which i am the only member. at first i didn't feel that comfortable with it, but the conversation is generally congenial and flaming has been kept to a minimum (although i can get snippy at times). at one time i considered

Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-15 Thread Ken Hanly
Hmmm and peccatum in Latin means sinIs there a connection :) Cheers, Ken Hanly - Original Message - From: J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:55 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8116] Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Speaking

Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-14 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Jim, So, you prefer "salience" to "social capital"? Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:05 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8073] Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Socia

Re: RE: Re: Re: Social Capital

2001-02-14 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Mat, But, if my recommending you to be published occurs in response to your having previously recommended that I be published, then this may be the payoff of a social reciprocity relation, certainly a cashing in of social capital in the Bourdieu sense, if not in the Loury/Coleman/Putnam

Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-14 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Speaking of the evolution of terms, the word capital itself originally meant a head of cattle in Latin. A pecus was just one cow, from which we get the word pecuniary, also Latin. I understand that the word fee is from faihu, Old German for a head of cattle. Barkley Rosser -Original

Re: Re: Re: Re: Social Capital

2001-02-13 Thread Jim Devine
At 03:05 PM 2/13/01 -0500, Doug wrote: Jim Devine wrote: isn't this what Clinton called "triangulation," using the other major party's rhetoric and programs to justify one's own programs? And should the Dem/GOP overlap be surprising, given how similar the two parties are? At 01:43 PM 2/13/01

Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-13 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Mat, Actually among the very first users of the term "social capital" was a very non-formalist anthropologist, Pierre Bourdieu, in his _Outline of a Theory of Practice_, English translation, 1977, original French version, 1972. His usage was somewhat different from the current Putnam et al

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-13 Thread Forstater, Mathew
some 'new' institutionalist stuff)? Let's start there. Mat -Original Message- From: J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:8053] Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Mat, Actually among the very f

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-13 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 5:52 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8062] RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Barkley- All very interesting. I know of Bordieu, but I admit I tried to start reading some of his stuff a few times and just couldn't get into it. Either I

Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-13 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
. Barkley Rosser, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 6:25 PM Subject: [PEN-L:8063] Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Mat, On the grounds of the questions you ask, I think you would not be unhappy with (most) of the social capital

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-13 Thread Jim Devine
At 08:45 PM 02/13/2001 -0500, you wrote: Mat, Actually we may be about to see a bunch of economists trying to pigeonhole this idea into more standard contexts. Expect game theory (evolution of cooperation). Expect minimizing transactions costs in new institutional contexts. I have no

Re: Re: Re: Re: Social Capital

2001-02-13 Thread Carrol Cox
Michael Perelman wrote: Once you leave the realm of Adam Smith's beaver and deer, everything gets fuzzy. I mentioned goodwill as another example. While a piece of software used as capital may resemble a machine more than Mickey Mouse, on the accountant's books such distinctions can

Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital

2001-02-13 Thread Ben Day
At 02:07 PM 2/13/01 -0600, you wrote: I should make clear, if my earlier post did not, that my problem is with the word "capital." Capital is very important to the study of capitalism (duh) and we can't just go throwing it around all over. Assassinating Bourdieu would be the quickest end. I