One needs to first understand Marx before even talking about Leninism..
Mine
>Then we are at an impasse. I think it is worth while to rescue the
>language of >socialism and Marxism from the Leninist distortions, but
perhaps it is >not. >Perhaps we have to invent a new political language.
R
age-
> From: Rod Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Friday, May 19, 2000 7:11 AM
> Subject: [PEN-L:19273] Re: Re: Re: : withering away of the state (fwd)
>
> >I have read everything.
> >
> >Rod
>
Rod,
"Everything"? Really? Ponomaesh Russki yazik?
Barkley Rosser
-Original Message-
From: Rod Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, May 19, 2000 7:11 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:19273] Re: Re: Re: : withering away of the
for example?
Mine
>I have read everything.
>Rod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What did you read about Soviet socialism?
>
> Mine
>
> >Interesting musings Carrol, but words have meanings, and what most people
> >mean by the word socialism is not what was seen in the USSR. You can call
> >it wh
I have read everything.
Rod
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What did you read about Soviet socialism?
>
> Mine
>
> >Interesting musings Carrol, but words have meanings, and what most people
> >mean by the word socialism is not what was seen in the USSR. You can call
> >it what you want, but I don't
What did you read about Soviet socialism?
Mine
>Interesting musings Carrol, but words have meanings, and what most people
>mean by the word socialism is not what was seen in the USSR. You can call
>it what you want, but I don't call it socialism.
Rod
Carrol Cox wrote:
> Rod Hay wrote:
>
> >
