At 01:06 PM 5/8/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Yes, baseball is like craft-based capitalism;
I think that the phrase "craft-based capitalism" is somewhat contradictory.
I think a better phrase would be "craft-based commodity exchange." Even
though professional baseball clearly reflects the class system
>>> Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/08/00 04:11PM >>>
At 01:06 PM 5/8/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Yes, baseball is like craft-based capitalism;
I think that the phrase "craft-based capitalism" is somewhat contradictory.
I think a better phrase would be "craft-based commodity exchange." Even
thoug
I meant an early form of capitalism in which small capitalists hired skilled
labor; i.e. master, journeyman,
Jim Devine wrote:
> At 01:06 PM 5/8/00 -0700, you wrote:
> >Yes, baseball is like craft-based capitalism;
>
> I think that the phrase "craft-based capitalism" is somewhat contradicto
Hi again,
Sez Jim:
>>Yes, baseball is like craft-based capitalism;
So how's cricket different? That's the reference point in this daft
proposition, isn't it? Anyway, it might be true that the US and Japan play
baseball. But the Cubans love it, too, don't they? What's the conclusion
these bl
The baseball/cricket proposition was not about sport, well not sport proper. It
was, I assume, a lark intended to make light of economic methodology.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]