that have
worked on this type of topic before?
-Nico
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Peter Dorman
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 3:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Re: Re: Being serious about Pomotismo (with quotes
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Being serious about Pomotismo (with quotes for Doug)
I agree with Yoshie here, and I d o not think that you believe what you say.
Do you find it hard to pass judgment on Henry Kissinger or George W.
Bush?
So, how did feminism start?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yoshie Furuhashi
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[PEN-L:1394] Re: Being serious about Pomotismo (with quotes for
Doug)
Am I right in locating the core error in pomoism (as currently defended)
in its assumption that claims are either "true" or "unjudgeable
opinions"? Such a view excludes the possibility of criteria that would
pass judgment on claims even in the absence of any knowledge that they
are truly "true".
I agree with Yoshie here, and I d o not think that you believe what you say. Do you
find it hard to pass judgment on Henry Kissinger or George W. Bush? --jks
>Understanding that this is relative however makes passing judgment almost
>impossible. And I am not talking about the judgment of wheth
I wasn't picking on Nicole, who is after all a student, but on supposedly professional
scholars in the pomo mode whose analysis is no better. I except some of the big shots:
Derrida, Foucault, DeLeuze, Rorty, etc., are quite sophisticated. Lytoard, however, is
not. --jks
In a message dated Wed
al Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Carrol Cox
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 5:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: Being serious about Pomotismo (with quotes for Doug)
Nicole Seibert wrote:
> The problem with acting like
Nicole Seibert wrote:
> The problem with acting like we
> know it all is that people then think we know it all.
Nicole, statements like this just make conversation impossible. No in
the history of the world (except possibly Duhring and Wagner) has
even pretended to "Know it All" -- and if yo
