Dialectical Economics is not a bad presentation
of a purist form of Marxism. LaRouche was at
one point (1950s, I believe) a member of the SWP,
and thus a straight Trotskyist, so to speak. He
morphed from that into his own thing when he formed
the NCLC in the late 1960s, especially in respon
riginal Message-
From: Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:42 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:16298] Re: Re: Forwarded from Harry Cleaver
>I have a copy. I wrote the author to ask him a question. He wrote back
>wi
Read a little. The annotated bibliography in the back, is fascinating.
Comments on everyone from Kant to Rosa Luxemburg. Also in the body of the
text he goes on and on about Riemann(?) Some physicist?
Maybe, I'll check it out of the SFPL.
Michael Pugliese
-Original Message-
From: Jim D
I have a copy. I wrote the author to ask him a question. He wrote back
with a 3 or 4 page single spaced type written letter.
I was impressed with the book at the time, but I don't remember why.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 07:02:14AM -0700, Jim Devine wrote:
> At 10:13 PM 08/23/2001 -0700, you wrot
