Interesting, because Krader's work on nomadic pastoralists is also
excellent.
-Original Message-
From: Rod Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, April 03, 2000 7:31 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:17694] Re: Re: Marx's materialism
And I must forceably put
Carrol Cox wrote:
I consider Ted's ideas on psychology not so much wrong as not
worth discussing. I wonder if we can find a common ground which will
enable us to state our disagreements. I could perceive no common ground
in his post on Freud/Klein etc.
"We murder to dissect."
"when your
Rod Hay wrote:
Second, it not an unusual position in twentieth century social science to
admit the dialectic between matter and idea. There are those who
occassionally go overboard (strict structuralists, sociobiologists, etc.)
but Carrol is right, very few deny the relationship. The task is
No point in continuing this line of discussion. We don't disagree. In a short post
it is impossible to even mention all aspects of the dialectic. Interdependence is
one aspect. Wholism is another. From those two internal relations can be derived.
The question between materialism and idealism is
It's scary- I'm getting old enough to make going back to my dissertation
bibliography nostalgic. Louis- wasn't this what you were also doing once at
the Graduate Faculty of the New School??
Naw. Staying out of the war in Vietnam was more like it.
Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list:
And I must forceably put forward the work of Lawrence Krader.
The Dialectics of Civil Society
Treatise of Social Labor
as the most significant outline of Marxist materialism in the second half of the
twentieth century.
Rod
Mathew Forstater wrote:
Louis:
This is the first attempt I've seen
I would add that to discuss Marx's materialism, one would have to take into
account the twentieth century contributions to the understanding of 'matter'
and 'energy'
Second, it not an unusual position in twentieth century social science to
admit the dialectic between matter and idea. There are
At 08:05 PM 04/02/2000 -0400, you wrote:
I would add that to discuss Marx's materialism, one would have to take into
account the twentieth century contributions to the understanding of 'matter'
and 'energy'
Second, it not an unusual position in twentieth century social science to
admit the
