Re: Re: Re: Question for Doug Henwood

2002-02-17 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
I think it's because while Ernst and Bellofiore had emphasized dynamic value alone long ago, it was becoming clear that there was a sharp divide between temporalists and simultaneists, and many of the bombastic dismissals of Marx in regards in particular to the falling rate/mass of profit

Re: Re: Question for Doug Henwood

2002-02-16 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
Eric, As I said, it looks extremely suspicious that a ban was imposed on Kliman simply because he may or may not have circulated a mss elsewhere after (for goodness' stake) RRPE rejected it the first time. He could have been warned, chastized, the rules could have been clarified, etc. But a

Re: Re: Question for Doug Henwood

2002-02-16 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
Rakesh, I would like proof (or at least a better argument) that Kliman was banned because of his politics. Your argument appears to be: Kliman has a particular politics; Kliman was banned; therefore, Kliman was banned because of his politics. I'll say again, Perhaps Rakesh can explain why RRPE

Re: Re: Re: Question for Doug Henwood

2002-02-16 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
I think it's because while Ernst and Bellofiore had emphasized dynamic value alone long ago, it was becoming clear that there was a sharp divide between temporalists and simultaneists, and many of the bombastic dismissals of Marx in regards in particular to the falling rate/mass of profit

Re: Re: Question for Doug Henwood

2002-02-16 Thread Michael Perelman
I left the heading alone only to remind you that such subject headings are usually a bad sign in themselves. As to the RRPE affair, those that know cannot tell and those that tell, as far as I can see, don't know. Let's drop that. As to the personal questions vis a vis Andrew K., they don't