He used _relative surplus value_ and _absolute surplus value_..
aren't these parts of LTV by definition?
Mine
Brad, Marx's theory of value is not nearly as mechanistic as you make it
out to be. In fact, he never used the term, LTV. Meek and Dobb and some
other interpreters presented the LTV
Yes, but the expression, labor theory of value, was not used by Marx. It
comes later. The expression itself give a sense of a fairly mechanistic
analysis. It lends itself to just adding up C + V+ S. Marx's theory was not
mechanistic.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He used _relative surplus