Yes, but the expression, labor theory of value, was not used by Marx. It
comes later. The expression itself give a sense of a fairly mechanistic
analysis. It lends itself to just adding up C + V+ S. Marx's theory was not
mechanistic.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> He used _relative surplus value
He used _relative surplus value_ and _absolute surplus value_..
aren't these parts of LTV by definition?
Mine
>Brad, Marx's theory of value is not nearly as mechanistic as you make it
>out to be. In fact, he never used the term, LTV. Meek and Dobb and some
>other interpreters presented the L
