Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the gospel of buddha

2001-06-09 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, Ann Li remarks and queries me, Ann Li, Doyle, Having read your prior post on the joint attention issue, I'd like to hear a bit more on how your knowledge production interests include network formation of "ideology" as well as perhaps Roemerian exploitation. I say this onl

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha

2001-06-06 Thread Michael Perelman
ednesday, June 06, 2001 11:35 AM > Subject: [PEN-L:12878] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha > > > > At 09:32 AM 6/6/01 -0700, you wrote: > > >We've got > > >non-alcohol beer, non-fat milk, and non-God religion, > > >otherwise kno

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha

2001-06-06 Thread Ken Hanly
secular humanism... Cheers, Ken Hanly - Original Message - From: Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:35 AM Subject: [PEN-L:12878] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha > At 09:32 AM 6/6/01 -0700, you wrot

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: the gospel of buddha

2001-06-06 Thread Jim Devine
At 09:32 AM 6/6/01 -0700, you wrote: >We've got >non-alcohol beer, non-fat milk, and non-God religion, >otherwise known as the Unitarians. The Unitarians >appararently can't give up the structure of the >church. as an excommunicated Unitarian and as a current goyisher participant in a secular Je