- Original Message -
From: "Michael Perelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 7:24 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:29381] Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
> Someone once proposed -- I think they pronounce it a law -- that
once the
> word Hitler appears in the
The actual law was that the first person to bring up "Hitler" was
automatically the loser of the debate. Since no one mentioned Stalin
until LP brought it up, does that mean this applies to him?
Michael Perelman wrote:
> Someone once proposed -- I think they pronounce it a law -- that once the
Michael Perelman wrote:
> Someone once proposed -- I think they pronounce it a law -- that once the
> word Hitler appears in the debate all dialogue is finished.
>
goodwin's law?
---
http://members.tripod.com/~goodwin_2/law.html
Goodwin's Law of Usenet
Professor Goodwin, U of I,
Yes, that is it. As Gar suggested Lou is declared the semi-looser, since
the Stalin law has not yet been made official. What would Hitler say?
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:53:55AM -0400, ravi wrote:
>
> goodwin's law?
>
> ---
>
> http://members.tripod.com/~goodwin_2/law.html
>
>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:53:55AM -0400, ravi wrote:
>
> goodwin's law?
>
what has processor speed doubling every two years got to do with this?
dd
___
Email Disclaimer
This communication may contain confidential or privileged information a
Title: RE: [PEN-L:29395] RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
how about Godwin's law -- i.e., that there are no laws?
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -Original Message-
> From: Davies, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]