OK. I was responding to the whole set of statements not just yours. I just meant to
clarify what's what from my understanding of the issues. You are
correct in your critique of Carrol.
Rod Hay wrote:
> Yes Ken. I misread your post. Sorry. An inconvenient line break. And a too quick
>reading an
Yes Ken. I misread your post. Sorry. An inconvenient line break. And a too quick
reading and provocation at your claim that my post was mostly wrong.
Your example is in fact the same example that Carnap uses in his Introduction to
Symbolic Logic. And yes, most tautologies cannot be recognised
i
