Since politics is about what people think, to
a great extent at least, the fact that the movement(s)
coalescing behind Nader have improved definition --
as a collectivity -- means the left is progressing. The
low Nader vote is not a great help in this vein, but it
does not detract from the
I don't translate Gitlin to 'enemy.' It just means
I expect less high-level guidance from him. He's
welcome in my movement, just not in a leadership
capacity.
mbs
I've thought Todd Gitlin was a dork for a long time. But "all enemies
on the right" does not a large movement make when you
in the first place. From a purely selfish point of view, as well as from the
point of view of effectiveness, there's nothing there for us, isn't that
right?
--jks
From: Brad DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:4190] Re: Re: Re: Stop the name
I don't translate Gitlin to 'enemy.' It just means
I expect less high-level guidance from him. He's
welcome in my movement, just not in a leadership
capacity.
mbs
I've thought Todd Gitlin was a dork for a long time. But "all enemies
on the right" does not a large movement make when you start
Michael Perelman wrote:
The VP doesn't do that much, although people say that he was decisive
welfare reform.
Every member of Clinton's cabinet, including Rubin, advised he veto
the welfare bill. Only Gore Dick Morris urged him to sign it.
Doug
I've heard this a bunch of times. But what's
Every member of Clinton's cabinet, including Rubin, advised he veto
the welfare bill. Only Gore Dick Morris urged him to sign it.
Doug
I've heard this a bunch of times. But what's the ultimate source?
Brad DeLong
The New York Times, August 1, 1996, Thursday, Late Edition - Final
THE
Brad DeLong wrote:
I've heard this a bunch of times. But what's the ultimate source?
The person I first heard it from got it from Dick Morris' book, I
think, but someone told me last night that Peter Edelman has been
saying the same thing.
Doug
who is he. Where did this appear?
Lisa Ian Murray wrote:
BDLYou think that Nader's 3% showing is impressive?
**
I don't know; do you think Rosa Parks was impressive or was that too, a
one-shot prisoners dilemma type game? We won't go into, why, if N was so
ultimately empty a
Wellstone?
"J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." wrote:
Michael,
I agree. But, who would have done better aside
from Clinton himself?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael,
Would be better than a lot. So might
Russ Feingold.
Barkley Rosser
-Original Message-
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, November 09, 2000 4:23 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:4211] Re: Re: Re: Re: Stop the name calling
MP
who is he. Where did this appear?
Lisa Ian Murray wrote:
David Ellerman is tucked away working on firm governance issues in Eastern
Europe for the WB. He also worked closely with Stiglitz when he was there.
The quote comes from "Intellectual Trespassing as a Way of Life"
BDLYou think that Nader's 3% showing is impressive?
**
I don't know;
So in other words, you don't.
Every member of Clinton's cabinet, including Rubin, advised he veto
the welfare bill. Only Gore Dick Morris urged him to sign it.
Doug
I've heard this a bunch of times. But what's the ultimate source?
Brad DeLong
Thanks...
Brad DeLong
BDLYou think that Nader's 3% showing is impressive?
**
I don't know;
So in other words, you don't.
**
Thank you God for collapsing the unpredictability of the future with your
unsurpassable foreknowledge of 21st century political-economic history. I
realize your
14 matches
Mail list logo
