Usually today people use the term when they are writing are the margins of
neo-classical economics (that includes Buchanan).
Barnet Wagman wrote:
> The term 'international political economy' is/was used by international
> political scientists like Susan Strange - their use of the the term is
> a
At 10:34 AM 04/08/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>The term 'international political economy' is/was used by international
>political scientists like Susan Strange - their use of the the term is
>almost entirely unrelated to its use by Smith or Marxians or Buchanan
>(in case things weren't confusing enough
Mine asks:
>
> Ted, why are you "radicalizing" Marshall and Keynes? In the final
> analysis, they are fundamentally different from Marx? aren't they?
>
I don't think the study of ideas in general or of the history of ideas in
particular is an intellectual version of World Wide Wrestling.
I'm
That is not the case in Canada. Here it is more usually associated with the
left nationalist.
Rod
Michael Perelman wrote:
> Usually today people use the term when they are writing are the margins of
> neo-classical economics (that includes Buchanan).
>
> Barnet Wagman wrote:
>
> > The term 'int
>Usually today people use the term when they are writing are the margins
>of
>neo-classical economics (that includes Buchanan).
>Barnet Wagman wrote:
>> The term 'international political economy' is/was used by international
>> political scientists like Susan Strange - their use of the the term
Michael wrote:
> Usually today people use the term when they are writing are the margins of
> neo-classical economics (that includes Buchanan).
>
I have always liked Branko Horvats definition of political economy
as "a fusion of economic and political theory into one single social
theory."
I
Ted wrote:
>For these purposes, the category "bourgeois thinker" is not merely not
>helpful it's disabling since it prevents us from examining ideas with what
>Keynes and Gadamer call "good will".
Mine didn't use the phrase "bourgeois thinker," but I agree: one can learn
from people like Keyne
>That is not the case in Canada. Here it is more usually associated with
>the
>left nationalist.
very true point, Rod! I have always beleived that there is something
interesting to look at in canadian leftism, eventhough canada
is one of the core capitalist powers. Once, the left was associate
>In Canada, as Rod indicates, it has taken a very special meaning
>as indicated in this quote from Wally Clement and Glen Williams,
>edicated collection _The New Canadian Political Economy_.
>"while political economy is based on a tradition that investigates
>the relationship between economy
Mine wrote:
>
>However,as you
> know, there are some Marxists in the Marxist tradition who uncritically
> subcribe to the notions of "orthodox" economics and free market
> capitalism. This, I would charecterize as economic determinism, has
> interesting commonalities with liberal economics since
true. that is what I "meant"...
Mine
Ted wrote:
>I didn't intend to suggest that Mine had used the phrase "bourgeois
>thinker". What I was getting at was the idea that seemed implicit in her
>question that Marshall and Keynes could not have radical ideas because
>they
>were not in some sense
11 matches
Mail list logo
