Re: Re: Supreme Court

2000-11-03 Thread Michael Perelman
I agree that the Bush administration together with the Republican Congress will be a disaster. I'm figuring that the disaster will coincide with an economic slowdown and that the Democrats might be forced to play and oppositional role. Even if we got Gore and a nominally democratic house, I

Re: Re: Re: Supreme Court

2000-11-03 Thread Carrol Cox
Michael Perelman wrote: The Democrats would continue caving to the Republicans. I simply don't believe this. I think you should take the Democrats at face value, what they say and how they vote. This so-called caving-in is no caving-in but simply manifests what the Democrats stand for. I

RE: Re: Supreme Court

2000-11-03 Thread Max Sawicky
We'll be keeping this puppy. Looks like grist for endless raspberries, after the fact. mbs . . . Here's my more precise early bird call on what to make of those first-to-be-announced results out of Kentucky. Given that it is strongly leaning Bush, if Bush takes it with more than an

Re: Re: Re: Supreme Court

2000-11-03 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
than any of the others or than anyone likely to be appointed by either Gush or Bore to replace him. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Friday, November 03, 2000 2:55 PM Subject: [PEN-L:3919] Re: Re: Supreme