Re: Re: Sweatshop and Underpollution Question

2000-09-30 Thread Michael Perelman
Yes, my voice recognition software is not feeling good today. I am typing my response. Brad De Long wrote: > >If market forces are supposed to allow poor nations to develop by > >accepting sweatshops and pollution, why has the recent upsurge in > >neoliberalism led to greater equality within na

Re: Re: Re: Sweatshop and Underpollution Question

2000-10-01 Thread Brad De Long
>Yes, my voice recognition software is not feeling good today. I am typing >my response. > >Brad De Long wrote: > >> >If market forces are supposed to allow poor nations to develop by >> >accepting sweatshops and pollution, why has the recent upsurge in >> >neoliberalism led to greater equalit

Re: Re: Re: Re: Sweatshop and Underpollution Question

2000-10-01 Thread Peter Dorman
Brad, this seems to contradict the conventional wisdom. Could you provide a reference? Peter Brad De Long wrote: > The 1990s *are* the first decade since the start of the industrial > revolution when world inequality dropped... > > Brad DeLong

Re: Re: Re: Re: Sweatshop and Underpollution Question

2000-10-01 Thread Michael Perelman
I have not seen anything that refutes Pritchett, Lant. 1997. "Divergence, Big Time." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11: 3 (Summer): pp. 3-17. Also, I don't know if we should cheer if China and India "catch up" if the bottom 2 quintiles get left behind. I am at fault for mentioning inequality

Re: Re: Re: Re: Sweatshop and Underpollution Question

2000-10-01 Thread Doug Henwood
Brad De Long wrote: >The 1990s *are* the first decade since the start of the industrial >revolution when world inequality dropped: the 50% jump in output per >capita in India and the doubling of output per capita in China in >the past decade are extremely nice to see... Milanovic found an inc