Michael Perelman writes:
Stephen Gould's is a great loss. He seems to have been an exceptional
person in many ways. He certainly has enriched my understanding of
economic processes, especially with his theory of the punctuated
equilibrium.
I loved Gould's work, especially his MISMEASURE OF
- Original Message -
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I loved Gould's work, especially his MISMEASURE OF MAN, a needed critique of
IQ tests and the like. But I think though the theory of punctuated
equilibrium is an important contribution to evolutionary theory, it isn't
that
In a message dated 5/21/02 9:04:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Stephen Gould's is a great loss. He seems to have been an exceptional
person in many ways. He certainly has enriched my understanding of
economic processes, especially with his theory of the punctuated
Let me rephrase Scott's question crudely: if Marx developed punctuated
equilibrium on his own and Gould was influenced by Marx, why would I possibly
need Gould to help me understand punctuated equilibrium?
This question makes me think of the difficulty that I sometimes encounter -- sort
of a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 May 2002 18:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:26130] Re: Re: gould dies at 60
(Thus water after it is heated up gradually,
suddenly begins to boil.
If you're going to show this book to people who
