Re: Re: re: whatever

2000-07-01 Thread Ken Hanly
Yes. Jevons did. So does this make Mark a neo-classical :) Cheers, Ken Hanly Doug Henwood wrote: Mark Jones wrote: Carrol, it's not a question of insults. The self-evident fact is that none of these people are capable of arguing for the positions they take, or didn't you notice? The

Re: Re: Re: re: whatever

2000-07-01 Thread M A Jones
Doug Henwood wrote: Speaking of neoclassicals, didn't Jevons worry about Britain running out of coal? And Jevons was right. Today the British coal industry has all-but disappeared and can never again, under any circumstances, be the energetics-base for large-scale capitalist production.

Re: Re: Re: Re: re: whatever

2000-07-01 Thread Doug Henwood
M A Jones wrote: Doug Henwood wrote: Speaking of neoclassicals, didn't Jevons worry about Britain running out of coal? And Jevons was right. Today the British coal industry has all-but disappeared and can never again, under any circumstances, be the energetics-base for large-scale

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: re: whatever

2000-07-01 Thread Mark Jones
Doug Henwood wrote: Britain may have lost its industrial dominance, and fallen relative to Germany and the US, but British per capita incomes are over nine times higher than what they were in 1870. But perhaps that ninefold increase is just the last burst of brightness before the lights