Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx new ref # 33417

2002-12-25 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, Sabri Oncu writes quoting me first, Doyle Sailor, (Sabri you misspelled my name, it is Saylor), > Let's talk about loose marbles. Two groups of e > people were churned by economic necessity, African > Americans during WWII to move to California, and from > Mexico and South A

Re: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx new ref # 33417

2002-12-27 Thread joanna bujes
At 10:57 PM 12/25/2002 -0800, you wrote: In regard to your remark about loneliness, the U.S. has a divided atomized people, does that make them weird? How do you measure loneliness? Some people are and some people aren't in the U.S. culture. Broad generalizations easily become a vehicle for pre

RE: Re: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx new ref # 33417

2002-12-29 Thread Devine, James
Title: RE: [PEN-L:33442] Re: Re: The Economist considers Karl Marx new ref # 33417 Joanna writes: > But take my word for it, [in the US] there is a level of anxiety, of unrelenting fear and mistrust, the likes of which I have not encountered anywhere else on earth.< Michael Moore