Re: Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-24 Thread William S. Lear
On Wednesday, February 23, 2000 at 17:59:53 (-0800) Brad De Long writes: >> >> >>Brad, just a small favor: could you find us a quote directly from Cumings's work where he claims "Syngman Rhee started the 1950-1953 Korean War"? I thought that he was much more circumspect than that. >>> >>

Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-24 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
>In a message dated 00-02-23 19:23:56 EST, you write: > ><< It's been a long time since I looked at Cumings and I can't say that I > read it completely. But my impression was that he was arguing that there had > been a civil war happening on the entire Korean peninsula in which there > was a somew

Re: Re: Re: Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-23 Thread Brad De Long
> The beginning of the >officially-designated "Korean War" was when the northern armies launched >what would have been a successful offensive if not for US intervention. I >think the point was that it really wasn't a matter of the north crossing >international boundaries, since the boundaries hadn

Re: Re: Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-23 Thread Brad De Long
> > >>Brad, just a small favor: could you find us a quote directly from >>>Cumings's work where he claims "Syngman Rhee started the 1950-1953 >>>Korean War"? I thought that he was much more circumspect than that. >> >>Hmmm... How about "The possibility that the South opened the fighting >>on Ong

Re: Re: Re: Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-23 Thread JKSCHW
In a message dated 00-02-23 19:23:56 EST, you write: << It's been a long time since I looked at Cumings and I can't say that I read it completely. But my impression was that he was arguing that there had been a civil war happening on the entire Korean peninsula in which there was a somewha

Re: Re: Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-23 Thread Jim Devine
> >>Brad, just a small favor: could you find us a quote directly from > >>Cumings's work where he claims "Syngman Rhee started the 1950-1953 > >>Korean War"? I thought that he was much more circumspect than that. > > >Hmmm... How about "The possibility that the South opened the fighting > >on On

Re: Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-23 Thread William S. Lear
On Wednesday, February 23, 2000 at 15:32:07 (-0800) Brad De Long writes: >>On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 12:50:11 (-0800) Brad De Long writes: CB: The U.S. imperialists carried out a war circa 1950 and still occupy the Southern part of the country. The U.S. still has 30,000 troo

Re: Re: Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-23 Thread Brad De Long
>On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 12:50:11 (-0800) Brad De Long writes: >>> >>>CB: The U.S. imperialists carried out a war circa 1950 and still >>>occupy the Southern part of the country. The U.S. still has 30,000 >>>troops and nuclear weapons there. >> >>I thought that Bruce Cumings's claim that S

Re: Re: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-15 Thread William S. Lear
On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 12:50:11 (-0800) Brad De Long writes: >> >>CB: The U.S. imperialists carried out a war circa 1950 and still >>occupy the Southern part of the country. The U.S. still has 30,000 >>troops and nuclear weapons there. > >I thought that Bruce Cumings's claim that South

RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-14 Thread Brad De Long
> >CB: The U.S. imperialists carried out a war circa 1950 and still >occupy the Southern part of the country. The U.S. still has 30,000 >troops and nuclear weapons there. I thought that Bruce Cumings's claim that South Korean dictator Syngman Rhee started the 1950-1953 Korean War had collapsed

Re: Re: Re: RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-14 Thread michael
N. Korea is a very infertile place -- by nature. Montana could not support a dense population either. -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Re: RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-14 Thread Jim Devine
>[N. Korea's] people are eating tree bark, for God's sake. didn't the also face extraordinarily bad weather and an embargo by the "West"? >Is there any reason not to conclude that combining the delights of High >Stalinism with those of hereditary monarchy is a really bad idea? why not? "Star

RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-13 Thread Nathan Newman
>On Behalf Of Brad De Long > > I like political democracy rather more than the next guy/gal (on this > list, at least). But it isn't the key to the riddle of history... > > http://www.nps.gov/malu/documents/jim_crow_laws.htm Then again, it was democracy that passed the Civil Rights Acts after th

Re: Re: RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-13 Thread Brad De Long
>Nathan writes: >>Questions raised are whether there are ways to better encorporate such >>qualitative measures into state planning. I would argue that without >>democracy as an alternative "feedback" loop to the market, undemocratic >>state planning must by nature ultimately fail. > >well phrase

Re: Re: RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-13 Thread Brad De Long
>Nathan writes: >>Questions raised are whether there are ways to better encorporate such >>qualitative measures into state planning. I would argue that without >>democracy as an alternative "feedback" loop to the market, undemocratic >>state planning must by nature ultimately fail. > >well phrase

Re: RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-13 Thread Brad De Long
> >On Behalf Of Louis Proyect >> These achievements were so remarkable that even Western >> economists began to >> speak of the "North Korean Miracle." In fact, according to the economist >> Joan Robinson, writing in 1965, "All economic miracles of the >> postwar world are put in the shade b

RE: Re: RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-13 Thread Nathan Newman
>On Behalf Of Michael Perelman > > Nathan, Bettleheim, some time ago, made the point that the > urgency of war caused > Lenin to establish systems of control much like those of the > capitalists. I > don't want to get into a Lenin vs. Trotsky, etc. line, but I think it is > important to remember

Re: RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-13 Thread Michael Perelman
Nathan, Bettleheim, some time ago, made the point that the urgency of war caused Lenin to establish systems of control much like those of the capitalists. I don't want to get into a Lenin vs. Trotsky, etc. line, but I think it is important to remember the context. Nathan Newman wrote: > >On Beh

Re: RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-13 Thread Jim Devine
Nathan writes: >Questions raised are whether there are ways to better encorporate such >qualitative measures into state planning. I would argue that without >democracy as an alternative "feedback" loop to the market, undemocratic >state planning must by nature ultimately fail. well phrased! BTW,

RE: capitalist versus socialist progress

2000-02-13 Thread Nathan Newman
>On Behalf Of Louis Proyect > These achievements were so remarkable that even Western > economists began to > speak of the "North Korean Miracle." In fact, according to the economist > Joan Robinson, writing in 1965, "All economic miracles of the > postwar world are put in the shade by these achi