Re: Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread Jim Devine
actually, I think that Palley is talking about the "contemporary economics profession," i.e, since 1960 or so. (The work that Justin refers to was done before that.) What's he's writing about (it seems to me) is that most economics is like Kuhn's "normal science" without the science. The fix i

Re: Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread Michael Perelman
Oh my God! Are these the most important? For whom? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > OK, but consider that among the most important works of economics of the last > century are Mises' article from 1920 on socialist calculation, Lange's > "reply" and Hayek's response, all journal articles, and Coase's

RE: Re: Re: Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread Lisa & Ian Murray
-ownership and computation perhaps? Ian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Schaap > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 8:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PEN-L:15873] Re: Re: Re: on how economists publish > >

Re: Re: Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread Rob Schaap
- > From: Rod Hay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PEN-L:15871] Re: Re: on how economists publish > Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:18:46 -0500 > >Some one has a strange view of economics if these are considered the most >important articles. Coase'

Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread Lisa & Ian Murray
8 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PEN-L:15868] Re: on how economists publish > > > OK, but consider that among the most important works of economics > of the last > century are Mises' article from 1920 on socialist calculation, Lange's > "reply" an

Re: Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread Rod Hay
Some one has a strange view of economics if these are considered the most important articles. Coase's paper is one of the great mysteries of bourgeois economics. How did such a vague, (fundamentally limited) paper ever attract any attention at all. Mises is wrong on socialism. Calculation is not a

Re: Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread Doug Henwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Coase's paper on the >theory of the firm, perhaps THE most important work in 20th century >economics. Eh? Why? Because for a moment, a big name future Nobelist took note of nonmarket institutions? More an indictment of the profession than something worthy of note in i

Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread JKSCHW
OK, but consider that among the most important works of economics of the last century are Mises' article from 1920 on socialist calculation, Lange's "reply" and Hayek's response, all journal articles, and Coase's paper on the theory of the firm, perhaps THE most important work in 20th century

Re: on how economists publish

2000-01-31 Thread Peter Dorman
amen Peter Jim Devine wrote: > "The contemporary economics profession emphasizes the journal article as > the vehicle for developing new knowledge claims in economics. In important > and poorly understood respects, this practice has changed the ways in which > knowledge claims are developed. Mo