I wrote:
Unlike some, I treat all my knowledge as working hypotheses to be
tested logically, empirically, methodologically, and in practice. Thus,
what I know changes over time.
Rakesh writes:
yet we hardly recognize that our positions have changed over time, which
so complicates the idea of
I wrote:
The MNCs are mostly for free trade, though they will take advantage of
existing trade restrictions, if they can.
Rakesh:
Jim, how do you know this?
The usual way I know things, from reading, from direct experience, and from
logically or intuitively figuring it out. But strictly
Jim Devine wrote:
I wrote:
The MNCs are mostly for free trade, though they will take
advantage of existing trade restrictions, if they can.
Rakesh:
Jim, how do you know this?
The usual way I know things, from reading, from direct experience,
and from logically or intuitively figuring it out.
But the self is in eclipse,
one way or another.
Hello Economucks,
Rakesh writes,
yet we hardly recognize that our positions have changed over time, which so
complicates the idea of a person as a substrate, no? It would seem to me
that if the net does succeed in allowing for some indepth discussion, the
rate at which our views change may
Jim D wrote
At 04:31 PM 07/17/2001 -0700, you wrote:
In any event, the world political economy has changed,
undermining the political basis for protectionism
... Not sure I agree here. Wouldn't the US state like to run a
trade deficit to its own mnc's and thus accept imports from where
