I wrote:
>>the aggregate production function, which Samuelson admitted years ago was
fallacious <<
Doug:
>Where'd he do that?
Paul A. Samuelson, 1966, "A Summing Up," QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS,
vol. 80, pp. 568-83. (Reprinted in G.G. Harcourt & N.F. Laing, CAPITAL AND
GROWTH, Penguin 1971
gt; Subject: [PEN-L:26251] Re: Re: Small and Imperfect Step to Alternative
> Text
>
>
>
> On Wed, 22 May 2002, Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> > Damn it. Not micro economics. I need a decent macro text,
> or is that an
> > oxymoron?
>
> Just out of curiousity,
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Michael Perelman wrote:
> Damn it. Not micro economics. I need a decent macro text, or is that an
> oxymoron?
Just out of curiousity, do you have any opinion of Brad DeLong's new
textbook? I haven't looked at it, I was just wondering if anyone else
has. He naturally has
Michael Perelman:
Damn it. Not micro economics. I need a decent macro text, or is that
an oxymoron?
if you don't mind anti-union rhetoric and a really bad sense of
organization, Gottheil presents an old-fashioned intro Keynesian textbook.
JD
Damn it. Not micro economics. I need a decent macro text, or is that an
oxymoron?
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE the call for an alternative text...
A crude draft of an alternative text can be found online at:
http://economics.csusb.edu/faculty/nilsson/nilsson.htm
Click on "Course Webpages" and then on "Economics 200: Principles of
Microeconomics."
Warning: expect some incoherence in these chapters as
