Michael Perelman wrote:
>I forgot about the Poole speech. It sounded dramatic, then
>everyone poo-pooed it [is that ok, Ken] so I forgot about it.
Your sub-contextualization of a previous concretization of thought in
relation to the Pooh-ization of post-modernization is a micro-critical
subalternalization of empirical class disenfrancisation macro-ized
relative to the hegemonic destabilization of the deeply-rooted teddy
bear-fixation (the sublimation of a projected cathartic syblingization
of all sorts of internal-externalization) inherent in the aspiration of
the pseudo-liberalization of the pan-classization of educationalization
such that the only rectification would be the reclamation of the
idolization of innocence against the neo-machinations of
fascist-supplication in the politicization of basic human gyration when
removed from the disimperialization-implication of de-masculinization of
the power player determination of gender realization in the school yard
of anti-co-creative-humanization (viz., anti-monad-determination) when
the substantiation of the objectification is, after all, really only the
penultimatization, though not the ultimatization, of political
nullification.
So, yes. It is okay. You spelled poo without an h.
Ken.
--
The glacier knocks in the cupboard,
The desert sighs in the bed,
And the cracks in the tea cup opens
A lane to the land of the dead.
-- W.H. Auden
"As I Walked Out One Evening"
