Seems to me old Karl had similar sentiments!

   Cheers, Ken Hanly




The Globe and Mail                           Wednesday, August 2, 2000

Corporate sponsors pay millions for delegates' parties and gifts

        'The system's broken; we are addicted to soft money,' McCain says

        By Barrie McKenna

Philadelphia -- Texas Governor George Bush and the Republicans
would like the thousands of delegates assembled in Philadelphia to
believe their four-day extravaganza is a gift from the party.

But the truth is that a long list of corporate sponsors are picking up
the
record $70-million-plus (U.S.) tab for the national convention.

Ten companies and organizations have coughed up more than
$1-million apiece to buy into the convention. Among them are AT & T
Corp., Motorola Inc., General Motors Corp., Bell Atlantic Corp. and
Comcast Corp. Hundreds more have contributed smaller amounts.

The corporate spending spree has produced an orgy of parties, golf
tournaments, yacht rides and gifts, which even some Republicans find
unseemly.

"The system's broken; we are addicted to soft money," Arizona
Senator John McCain complained to reporters yesterday as he
returned to the reform theme he wielded repeatedly during his
unsuccessful run for the Republican presidential nomination earlier this
year.

But Mr. McCain remarked that the Democrats are just as guilty of
accepting the unregulated convention-related gifts.

"The fact is it's a bipartisan issue," he said.

With the Republicans ahead in the polls and confident of being able to
recapture the White House from Democratic President Bill Clinton
after eight years, there has been no shortage of willing donors here in
Philadelphia.

Conventions were once a forum for policy debates and grassroots
politicking, but they have evolved into a venue for lobbyists to rub
shoulders with political power brokers outside the confines of
Washington, Sheila Krumholz, research director of the
Washington-based Center for Responsive Politics, said.

"This is the most brazen display of special-interest lobbying I've ever
seen," Ms. Krumholz said of the Philadelphia convention, which ends
tomorrow with Mr. Bush's confirmation as the Republican candidate
for the presidency. "This is an exclusive event for political elites, to
the
exclusion of the vast majority of Americans."

Adding to the donor frenzy at this year's conventions is the belief that
control of the Senate, the House of Representatives and the White
House are potentially up for grabs. The Republicans currently have a
majority in both houses of Congress, while the Democrats rule the
White House.

Even some delegates acknowledge that the Philadelphia sponsorship
activity has been blatant and unprecedented.

"If you feel compelled to buy one drink you're a social outcast," said
Mike Hellon, a delegate from Arizona who's been at every Republican
convention since 1976. "That's just part of the American political
culture that is inbred, and you're probably not going to change it."

Often these events are used to solicit further contributions from big
donors to help finance the fall elections. Free food and booze is just
the start. And nothing, it seems, is too extravagant.

Union Pacific has brought in 30 vintage rail cars, set out on nearly a
kilometre of freshly laid track near the convention site. The cars are
being used as private suites to wine and dine Republicans.

"We are here to do some business," Union Pacific official Gary Shuster
bluntly told The Philadelphia Inquirer this week.

The company has even set aside a historic Pullman car for the
exclusive use of House Majority Whip Tom DeLay of Texas.

Union Pacific vigorously opposed Montreal-based Canadian
National's aborted takeover of U.S.-based Burlington Northern Santa
Fe earlier this year. The company is an active lobbyist on railway
regulatory issues in Washington.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, already one of the most vocal
lobbies in Washington, has rented a large yacht and moored it out on
the nearby Delaware River.

Then there has been a string of massive parties for members of
Congress. Billed as tributes to people such as Senate Majority Leader
Trent Lott and Representative J. C. Watts, the parties were paid for
entirely by corporate sponsors.

The money doesn't always get sponsors everything they want.
Cigarette maker Philip Morris Cos. Inc. coughed up $250,000 for the
Philadelphia convention. But all that money hasn't bought it a smoking
area in the First Union Center or any of the surrounding pavilions.

Still, that doesn't seem to be hindering the company, which has been
trying to promote all its non-tobacco products instead. Philip Morris
has stuffed delegate "goody bags" with an array of its products,
including Altoids mints, Toblerone chocolates, Maxwell House coffee,
Miller beer and Philadelphia cream cheese, as well as specially made
Kraft Dinner noodles in the shape of an elephant, the Republican
mascot.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Globe and Mail                              Wednesday, August 2, 2000

Just some old-time debauchery in Philly

        By Jeffrey Simpson

Philadelphia -- In this city of hoagies and pretzels, Republicans are
holding a convention of shrimp and caviar.

The lavish food spread through the salons of Philadelphia's hotels and
restaurants typifies the marriage of corporate America to politics.

Fat cat America loves George W. Bush and has showered more
money on his campaign than on any other in the history of U.S. politics.
The Republican presidential candidate will arrive today in Philadelphia
with $93-million in the bank for his campaign, and millions more will
undoubtedly be vacuumed from corporations and individuals this
week.

But corporate largesse extends beyond Mr. Bush. In hotels and
watering holes across Philadelphia, corporate America brazenly and
shamelessly is showing its appreciation for favours past and future from
Republican legislators. Cocktail parties honouring congressmen.
Dinners hailing senators. Lunches in praise of non-elected Republican
worthies. All sponsored by corporations or trade associations to curry
favour with Republicans in general and powerful Republicans in
particular.

Want to ride down the Delaware River with the Speaker of the
House? Play golf with powerful congressional committee chairmen?
Schmooze with party worthies at invitation-only receptions? Then
Philadelphia is for you, at an admittedly hefty price. But then what's a
couple of tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, of dollars
when a legislative change or a presidential order can make your
company millions later on?

The largesse extends to the door of the convention. Union Pacific has
brought 30 spit-and-polished railway cars and parked them on special
tracks outside the convention site. Inside the cars, Republicans
entertain their corporate friends, or corporations use them to impress
political bigwigs. Inside the First Union Center itself, the skyboxes are
all reserved for corporations and wealthy contributors.

Philadelphia is an orgy of political debauchery layered with helpings of
hypocrisy, as politicians deny being influenced by all this attention and
money. At least the corporations are more honest. The road builders
love how Mr. Bush opposed any reduction in the gas tax dedicated for
highway construction. The oil and gas industry admires the
Republicans' indifferent interest in environmental regulation. The
tobacco industry is over the moon at the party's reluctance to attack its
product. The chemical manufacturers adore Mr. Bush's promise to go
easy on them. And, of course, the wealthy and the comfortable just
can't wait for the Republicans to cut their taxes.

Earlier this year, insurgent Republican candidate John McCain
castigated U.S. politics for its dependence on private money. The
media and independent voters loved the message; Republicans hated
it. The party, then as now, was awash in money, and when it looked as
if Mr. McCain might be making some headway, the Bush campaign
pumped in a few additional tens of millions of advertising dollars and
sank Mr. McCain's chances.

Mr. Bush, backed by a group of wealthy businessmen, had collected
so much money before the primaries that he didn't need to abide by
spending limits required of candidates who want matching public funds.
He spent more than he had planned to squelch the McCain insurgency,
but more money was easily forthcoming.

The debauchery in Philadelphia -- to be repeated when the Democrats
gather in Los Angeles in two weeks -- is the subject of much tut-tutting
in circles wishing to see more disinterested politics in the United
States.
Various worthy groups have proposed a series of changes to diminish
the influence of money on politics, but every recent attempt at serious
financing reform has failed.

Mr. McCain and a few hardy Republican souls aside, the party likes
things pretty much as they are. And why not, with corporations and
wealthy Americans so eager to fill the party's coffers? After all, say
Republicans, look how much President Bill Clinton raised for his two
campaigns. As for Vice-President Al Gore, he's proposed sweeping
financing reform; but, with his track record as a Democratic vacuum
cleaner for cash, few Americans take him seriously.

Mr. Bush never stops talking about making the Republican Party more
"inclusive" by reaching out to minorities and women. He's got a long
way to go with both groups, but he's got most of America's plutocrats
already included in the party. Both the plutocrats and the party are
having a grand old time in Philly.


Reply via email to