/* Written  7:07 AM  Jul  8, 1994 by kmander in igc:trade.news */
/* ---------- "Trade Week 7-8-94" ---------- */
Trade Week in Review and Resources
Friday, July 8, 1994
Volume 3, Number 27
_________________________________________________
Headlines:
WHITE HOUSE, BUSINESS TEAM UP FOR GATT
AEROSPACE SUBMITS GATT LANGUAGE
GERMANY TO CHALLENGE BANANA QUOTA
CLINTON CONSIDERS SPECTRUM TAX FOR GATT
U.S. RULES AGAINST CHEAP EU CHEESE
WHEAT GROWERS SEEK EEP CHANGES
RESOURCES
_________________________________________________
GATT NEWS SUMMARY
_________________________________________________
WHITE HOUSE, BUSINESS TEAM UP FOR GATT

The July 2 issue of NATIONAL JOURNAL describes how Washington's 
top corporate lobbyists and the Clinton administration are working 
together to lobby Congress on the Uruguay Round.  They've 
assembled many of the same lobbyists and officials who led the fight 
for NAFTA.  "We're trying to utilize the administration people who 
had experience with the NAFTA debate, and that experience is 
already paying dividends," said Edward S. Knight, who is coordinating 
the White House's contacts with the business community.  "There's no 
need to reinvent the wheel."  

The pro-GATT forces are hoping to get an earlier start in promoting 
GATT than they did with NAFTA.  As part of that effort, the Business 
Roundtable, the National Association of Manufacturers and the U.S. 
Chamber of Commerce have launched the Alliance for GATT NOW, a 
campaign of Washington lobbying, grassroots campaigning, 
advertising and public relations that is reminiscent of the 
USA*NAFTA coalition.  The alliance has asked 220 business 
executives to help push GATT through Congress by contacting 
lawmakers, in person if possible.  

Administration officials have also been speaking to key groups of 
opinion leaders to generate support for the trade pact.  The 
Commerce Department even produced reports detailing the benefits 
of GATT by state and by sector, leading some lobbyists to question 
whether the administration is violating statutes that prohibit federal 
departments and agencies from using appropriated funds for 
lobbying purposes.

The article describes how opposition from environmental, consumer, 
labor and other groups is also heating up, but contends that these 
groups will have a tougher time than they did with NAFTA because 
the GATT text is so complicated.

Source: Peter H. Stone, "GATT-ling Guns," NATIONAL JOURNAL, July 2, 
1994.
_________________________________________________
AEROSPACE SUBMITS GATT LANGUAGE

The U.S. aerospace industry has sent the Clinton administration 
language it would like included in GATT implementing legislation.  
The industry is seeking language forcing the U.S. to reject proposals 
by other countries to weaken international trading rules limiting 
government subsidies to the aircraft industry.  

Don Fuqua, president of the Aerospace Industries Association, said 
U.S. aerospace companies are concerned that the European Union is 
apparently ready to violate two aircraft subsidies codes limiting 
subsidies for large civil aircraft.

The White House will seriously consider the language because it is 
relying on help from the aerospace industry in promoting GATT in 
the state of Washington and Congress.  Boeing has been enlisted to 
fulfill the lead lobbying role for the aerospace industry as part of the 
Alliance for GATT NOW coalition.

Source: "U.S. Aerospace Firms Submit Plan for Implementing GATT 
Trade Agreement," BNA, July 7, 1994.
_________________________________________________
GERMANY TO CHALLENGE BANANA QUOTA

Germany plans to ask the European Court to review the legality of 
new European Union banana import quotas.  German officials contend 
the quotas discriminate against its traditional Latin American 
suppliers and favor former European colonies in the African, 
Caribbean and Pacific group.  German officials said the quotas conflict 
with aspects of EU and GATT laws and that they have resulted in 
higher prices and a  25 percent drop in sales of bananas.

Source: "Germany Plans Second Banana Quota Challenge," FINANCIAL 
TIMES, July 7, 1994.
__________________________________________________
CLINTON CONSIDERS SPECTRUM TAX FOR GATT

A bipartisan group of 43 members of the House of Representatives 
has written to outgoing Budget Director Leon Panetta opposing a tax 
on radio and television broadcasters and wireless communications as 
a way of paying for the lost federal revenue resulting from GATT.

Representative Thomas Ewing (R-Illinois), who organized the sending 
of the letter, said the administration has been considering a tax as 
high as five percent of revenues "as one way to meet budget rules 
necessary for passage" of the GATT implementing bill.  The letter 
states that a spectrum tax would "slow down development of the 
information superhighway" and "make GATT harder to pass in the 
Congress."

In a separate letter sent late last month, Senator Conrad Burns (R-
Montana) urged Panetta to "withdraw from consideration" the 
proposal to impose a spectrum tax.  Burns wrote: "As a matter of 
principle,  broadcast station owners should not be asked to 
underwrite the cost to implement a treaty from which they have no 
benefit."

Source: "Members Rally Against Spectrum Tax to Pay for GATT," 
CONGRESSDAILY, July 5, 1994.
_________________________________________________
U.S. RULES AGAINST CHEAP EU CHEESE

The U.S. Department of Agriculture ruled last month that Austria, 
Denmark and Germany are illegally using government subsidies to 
lower the price of Swiss cheese exported to the United States.  If the 
three countries do not stop dumping cheese in the U.S., the U.S. 
government will be required to impose punitive tariffs or reduce 
quotas on the cheese.

Stewart Huber, president of the Farmers Union Milk Marketing 
Cooperative, welcomed the decision, but said the case demonstrates 
the difficulties of enforcing  current U.S. trade laws even with 
current quotas in place.  "That's why we're so concerned that we will 
face much greater dairy import problems when Section 22 and other 
current safeguards are eliminated under the new GATT agreement," 
Huber said.

Meanwhile, members of the Dairy Trade Coalition (DTC)  welcomed 
the creation of the bipartisan Congressional Dairy Task Force on 
GATT.  The 26-member task force was formed to monitor whether 
DTC's list of changes to GATT implementing legislation is adopted.  
"The Uruguay Round of GATT is a miserable failure for American 
dairy farmers," said Representative Steve Gunderson (R-Wisconsin).

Sources: "FUMMC Wins Swiss Cheese Dumping Decision," MILK 
MATTERS, June 30, 1994; "Congressional Dairy Task Force Formed to 
Push GATT Changes," MILK MATTERS, June 30, 1994.
__________________________________________________
WHEAT GROWERS SEEK EEP CHANGES

The National Association of Wheat Growers (NAWG) is calling for 
changes in federal export subsidy programs, such as the Export 
Enhancement Program (EEP), to conform with the mandates of the 
Uruguay Round of GATT.  NAWG President Carl Schwensen said the 
new GATT pact "will do nothing to discipline unfair practices of 
monopolistic state trading agencies or other countries who employ 
predatory pricing practices."

Source: "US Wheat Growers Seek Govt. Export Help Under GATT," 
REUTER, July 1, 1994.
__________________________________________________
RESOURCES
__________________________________________________
For copies of the following, please contact the authors or 
organizations listed:

"The East India Company, Free Trade and GATT," Vandana Shiva, 
1994.  7 pages.   Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, 1313 5th 
St. S.E., Suite 303, Minneapolis, MN  55414-1546.  (612) 379-5980.  
Fax: (612) 379-5982.  $2.
A concise history of free trade in India from the seventeenth century 
to the present day.

"The GATT Tuna Dolphin II Decision and Its Potential Application to 
the EU Leghold Trap Regulation," Leesteffy Jenkins, HUMANE 
SOCIETY, June 8, 1994.  5 pages.  Institute for Agriculture and Trade 
Policy, 1313 5th St. S.E., Suite 303, Minneapolis, MN  55414-1546.  
(612) 379-5980.  Fax: (612) 379-5982. $2.

"U.S. Ratification of Biodiversity Convention," BIODIVERSITY ACTION, 
Vol. 1, No. 1, Spring 1994.  8 pages.  Sheldon Cohen, BIONET, 424 C 
Street N.E., Washington, D.C.  20002.  (202) 547-8902.  Fax:  (202) 
544-8483.  Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
This inaugural issue outlines positions on the Biodiversity Convention 
from Congress, the U.S. Administration, industry and non-
governmental organizations.

"Scaling the Peaks of Self-Governance in Nepal," SELF- GOVERNANCE, 
Summer 1994.  2 pages.  International Center for Self-Governance, 
720 Market Street, San Francisco, CA  94102.  (415) 981-5353, ext. 
226.  Fax: (415) 986-4878.  Free.

"In The Public Interest?: Privatization and Public Sector Reform," 
Brendan Martin, ZED BOOKS/ PUBLIC SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, 
1993.  Humanities Press International, Inc. 165 First Avenue, 
Atlantic Highlands, NJ 07716.  (908) 872-1441.  Fax: (980) 872-0717.  
$19.95.
_________________________________________________

Reply via email to