oblem" [was US Consume r
Confidence...]
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:57:06 -0600, Forstater, Mathew wrote:
>I haven't been following this thread (multiple apologies), but what was wrong
>with Shaikh's solution? []
The New Palgrave entry on "Transformation Problem&quo
I published an article pertaining to the transformation problem.
Someone posted a version of my Cambridge Journal article on the Web.
http://www.ucm.es/wwwboard/bas/messages/223.htm
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 11:49:08PM -0500, Andrew Hagen wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:57:06 -0600, Forstater, Ma
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:57:06 -0600, Forstater, Mathew wrote:
>I haven't been following this thread (multiple apologies), but what was wrong
>with Shaikh's solution? []
The New Palgrave entry on "Transformation Problem" argues that the solution given in
Shaikh's 1977 paper did
not have tota
