U.S. growth

1997-12-05 Thread Doug Henwood
I asked this question on Post-Keynesian thought a year or so ago, and got no satisfactory answers. With the strong U.S. employment report released this morning - payroll growth of over 400,000, a drop in the unemployment rate to 4.6% (the lowest in 24 years), and real wage growth approaching 2% -

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-05 Thread Shawgi A. Tell
Greetings, On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, Doug Henwood wrote: > I asked this question on Post-Keynesian thought a year or so ago, and got > no satisfactory answers. With the strong U.S. employment report released > this morning - payroll growth of over 400,000, a drop in the unemployment > rate to 4.6% (t

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-05 Thread Doug Henwood
Shawgi A. Tell reproduces every tired leftist cliche about the U.S. labor market in just three paragraphs, an impressive achievement. >I think it is necessary to avoid focusing on the appearance of >things and move directly to the essence of matters. In terms of >unemployment, the so-called lowe

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-05 Thread Shawgi A. Tell
Greetings, On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, Doug Henwood wrote: > Shawgi A. Tell reproduces every tired leftist cliche about the U.S. labor > market in just three paragraphs, an impressive achievement. Please let's not lower the level of discussion. > >I think it is necessary to avoid focusing on

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-06 Thread Shawgi A. Tell
Greetings, On Sat, 6 Dec 1997, Rebecca Peoples wrote: > Shawgi, > > Would you please explain to me how the unemployment rate > underestimates the unemployment situation. And what is the difference > between the jobless rate and the unemployment rate? Are they not one and > the same thing. >

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-08 Thread bill mitchell
Doug's prompts have interested me a lot - more than a lot of recent pen-l topics. > Replying to louis (who has given us some excellent articles on environment/economic issues, thanks): Doug said: > >Two points. First, a sustained unemployment rate of below 5% does seem to >be having the desired ef

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-09 Thread Doug Henwood
anzalone/starbird wrote: >Actually the gender gap, at least in income is not narrowing by BLS >statistics, it is widening. ellen Huh? Which BLS stats? Census Bureau numbers for 1996 show the narrowest gender gap in history. Doug

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-08 Thread anzalone/starbird
Actually the gender gap, at least in income is not narrowing by BLS statistics, it is widening. ellen >Shawgi A. Tell reproduces every tired leftist cliche about the U.S. labor >market in just three paragraphs, an impressive achievement. > >>I think it is necessary to avoid focusing on the appear

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-07 Thread Doug Henwood
Belatedly Louis Proyect wrote: >Doug, what do you make of Alex Cockburn's recent LA Times article: > >Here, on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is what has happened to >real compensation (wages plus benefits) since the start of the Clinton >presidency. In 1993, it fell by 0.4%; in 1

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-05 Thread Dennis R Redmond
On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, Doug Henwood wrote: > I asked this question on Post-Keynesian thought a year or so ago, and got > no satisfactory answers. With the strong U.S. employment report released > this morning - payroll growth of over 400,000, a drop in the unemployment > rate to 4.6% (the lowest in

Re: U.S. growth

1997-12-05 Thread Louis Proyect
Doug Henwood: > >The point isn't that "things are actually going well" - the point is that >they're a lot better than they were 5 years ago. Real wages are rising, and >the race and gender gaps are narrowing. Sure lots of shit jobs are being >created, but that's not the whole story, or you wouldn