Saudis Face U.S. Demand On Terrorism
Halting Financiers May Be Urged

By Douglas Farah
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, November 26, 2002; Page A01


A National Security Council task force is recommending an action plan to
President Bush that is designed to force Saudi Arabia to crack down on
terrorist financiers within 90 days or face unilateral U.S. action to bring
the suspects to justice, senior U.S. officials said yesterday.

The interagency plan, devised before the recent furor over allegations of
Saudi involvement in terror financing, comes amid growing concern among some
congressional leaders and U.S. allies that the administration has been
unwilling to press Saudi Arabia for action for fear of alienating a key Arab
ally as possible war with Iraq looms.

The officials would not say what unilateral U.S. action might entail. But
they said the United States would first present the Saudis with intelligence
and evidence against individuals and businesses suspected of financing al
Qaeda and other terrorist groups, coupled with a demand that they be put out
of business. In return, one senior official said, the administration will
say, "We don't care how you deal with the problem; just do it or we will"
after 90 days.

How demands would be presented to the Saudis is still under debate. They
range from sending a high-profile Cabinet official to Riyadh to issuing a
formal démarche to the Saudi government through the ambassador, the
officials said. The officials stressed that the goal was to cut off funds
before another terror attack can occur, and said they would press the Saudis
to act even if there was not enough information to convict someone in a
court of law.

U.S. intelligence agencies and financial investigators have put together a
classified, working list of nine wealthy individuals believed to be the core
group of financiers for al Qaeda and other radical Islamic terror groups,
U.S. officials said. Of those, seven are Saudis, one is a Pakistani merchant
and one is an Egyptian businessman. The officials would not identify the
individuals.

"There are some who argue that sharing intelligence with the Saudis is just
plain stupid," one official said. "But in so doing we put down a marker. We
are saying we are not acting unilaterally, we are not moving precipitously,
we are not acting as a hostile force.

"We tell them the problem and leave it to them to solve, presuming they will
act in good faith. But if they do not act in 90 days, we assume solving the
problem is beyond their ken and the United States will solve it."

News of the decision to confront the Saudis follows a weekend of news
reports that a charitable contribution by Princess Haifa al-Faisal, the wife
of the Saudi ambassador to the United States, may have indirectly benefited
two of the men who participated in the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks.

The reports prompted criticism of Saudi Arabia among lawmakers, including
Sen. Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala), who said the Saudis had "a lot of answering
to do" in their efforts to cut off terrorist financing.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, in an appearance Friday with Bush in St.
Petersburg, Russia, pointedly mentioned that 15 of the 19 hijackers were
Saudis. Recent studies of terrorist financing have concluded that most of
the terrorists' money is raised in Saudi Arabia.

The Saudis say, however, that they have been cooperating in the war on
terror financing and have not been presented with solid evidence on some
targets of the proposed U.S. crackdown.

Saudi Interior Minister Prince Nayef yesterday called the allegations of
Saudi officials' funding terrorism "baseless fabrications." An editorial in
the state-controlled newspaper Al-Watan said such claims were part of a
politically motivated campaign in some U.S. circles aimed at "distorting the
kingdom's reputation."

A senior Saudi official said his government had received no indication that
a high-level envoy was set to deliver evidence and demand action. He said he
did not understand why U.S. officials were "spewing these outrageous
comments to the press" when the two nations were working closely together,
hampered mostly by an unwieldy U.S. bureaucracy in which one
counterterrorism office often seems not to know what the other offices do.

"We received four identical requests for information over a three-month
period from different U.S. government agencies," the official said. "How the
hell do you know who to talk to in this government? But the truth is, we are
both primary targets of terrorists. Where is the logic in our stifling or
shutting down investigations?"

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer yesterday called Saudi Arabia a "good
partner in the war on terrorism." But he said the United States would
continue to press Saudi Arabia and other countries to "do more in the fight
against terrorism" on the financial, diplomatic and political fronts.

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, speaking to reporters on his plane as he
headed to a conference in Mexico City, said, "I think it unlikely that
Princess Haifa and [Saudi Ambassador] Prince Bandar [bin Sultan] would do
anything knowingly to support anybody connected to terrorist activity."

U.S. officials yesterday played down the reports of money from Princess
Haifa aiding terrorists, but the case nevertheless exemplified what they
described as a major problem in U.S.-Saudi relations: the lack of
accountability in tracing where charitable contributions end up. Several
prominent Muslim charities based in Saudi Arabia have been found to provide
money and logistical support to al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations.

"You have rivers of cash flowing out of Saudi Arabia all around the world
with no real controls whatsoever," one senior official said. "It is very,
very easy to apply that money to a host of criminal and terrorist acts
because no one pays attention or seems to care."

Another senior official said the administration was trying to walk a fine
line between cutting off terrorist financing and trying to control religious
views, including fundamentalist, anti-American Islamic teaching paid for by
the Saudi government.

"There may be tens of millions of dollars spent to fund terrorism, but there
are hundreds of millions of dollars spent to propagate extreme, intolerant
religious views that are highly critical of Western values, and that is our
most bedeviling problem," a senior U.S. official said. "When money goes to
the propagation of uncompromising, unforgiving, hostile views of other
faiths, and they broadcast that, it is more likely than not the money is
going to be used for violence."

The task force is composed of senior members of U.S. agencies attempting to
stanch the flow of money to terrorists, and is convened by the National
Security Council. Its action plan has been approved in concept by the
Cabinet secretaries and other officials who make up Bush's team of top
national security advisers. That group intends to review the language of the
plan before it is presented to Bush.

U.S. officials said planning for a high-level confrontation with the Saudi
government began shortly after Sept. 9, when the two governments announced
they were jointly designating a Saudi citizen as a terrorist sponsor and
freezing his assets, heralding a new era of cooperation .

Less than 48 hours later, two senior Saudi officials publicly disowned the
designation of Wa'el Jalaidan, a co-founder of al Qaeda, infuriating U.S.
officials. A Saudi official said later the disavowal was the result of a
"misunderstanding."

According to two senior administration officials, while the Saudi government
ultimately did designate Jalaidan a terrorist financier, the conflict marked
a turning point even for those in the administration who had argued against
pressing the Saudis too hard on terrorism.

"We were livid at the disavowal of the Jalaidan designation," a senior U.S.
official said. "The Saudi public statements in that case were nothing short
of schizophrenic. Saudi Arabia is one of the epicenters of terrorist
financing."

U.S. intelligence officials believe most terrorist money still originates in
Saudi Arabia, and must be cut to prevent more terrorist attacks. While $113
million in terrorist funding worldwide has been frozen since Sept. 11, there
have been virtually no significant seizures in recent months. Intelligence
sources and several new studies have concluded that al Qaeda's financial
structure remains largely intact and retains access to tens of millions of
dollars.

"Money fuels the business of terror," David Aufhauser, the Treasury
Department's general counsel, told the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.
"We can stop the killing if we can stop the flow of money but . . . the
overwhelming bulk of the assets that we seek to freeze, the cash flow that
we hope to slow and the records that we hope to audit are beyond the oceans
that surround us."

One sign of the administration's new, harder line, U.S. officials said, was
the unwillingness to discourage, either publicly or privately, the families
of Sept. 11 victims who have brought a $1 trillion lawsuit against about 150
defendants they charge willfully aided al Qaeda by providing financial and
logistical support to the terrorists.

Saudi officials have repeatedly expressed their concern about the case to
U.S. officials, administration sources said. Among the defendants are
several of Saudi Arabia's wealthiest citizens, including some members of the
royal family, as well as several of the kingdom's largest financial
institutions.

While the State Department has floated the idea of trying to trying to get
the lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, dismissed or
delayed out of concern that it will damage U.S.-Saudi relations, senior
administration officials said there are no such plans at this time.

Staff writers Peter Baker in Riyadh and Glenn Kessler in Mexico City
contributed to this report.

Reply via email to