At 07/07/01 09:12 -0700, you wrote:
>Chris, you have "refuted" Lou P. twice this morning. Please, he is no
>longer here, so this does no good now.
Well Lou no doubt browses and also considers how best to use his time. He
has promoted his list as a internet feature and wishes to be influential.
Chris, you have "refuted" Lou P. twice this morning. Please, he is no
longer here, so this does no good now.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Out of a desire to let things settle I did not raise this at the time but I
want firmly to refute a suggestion that Louis Proyect suspended his
involvement in this list, because he was being baited, in case he returns,
but unfortunately with this an assumption.
His return after a period of tho
>Louis writes:
>Au contraire. This is a bait:
>
>"If Louis Proyect and others cannot be given the opportunity of
>differentiating themselves from positions they consider liberal or social
>democrat, they might logically be obliged to withdraw from such a list as
>this, whic
It really does not matter who said what at this point. We should be more
concerned about what goes on in the future.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 09:56:05AM -0700, Jim Devine wrote:
> Louis writes:
> Au contraire. This is a bait:
>
> "If Louis Proyect and others cannot be given the oppor
Louis writes:
Au contraire. This is a bait:
"If Louis Proyect and others cannot be given the opportunity of
differentiating themselves from positions they consider liberal or social
democrat, they might logically be obliged to withdraw from such a list as
this, which would
> >Nobody is trying to bait you.
>>
>>Yoshie
>
>Au contraire. This is a bait:
>
>"If Louis Proyect and others cannot be given the opportunity of
>differentiating themselves from positions they consider liberal or social
>democrat, they might logically be obliged to withdraw from such a list as
>
>Nobody is trying to bait you.
>
>Yoshie
Au contraire. This is a bait:
"If Louis Proyect and others cannot be given the opportunity of
differentiating themselves from positions they consider liberal or social
democrat, they might logically be obliged to withdraw from such a list as
this, whic
>I have no objections to being baited, provoked or whatever.
Nobody is trying to bait you. What's been going on are theoretical
disagreements, which may or may not have political implications.
Folks can have very different theories and yet come to the same
practical political conclusions on m
Jim Devine:
>means by a "communist party" doesn't it?) If Louis is so sensitive that he
>can't respond to a comment that says he's wrong on a highly specific
>empirical issue, he should leave the list. But I don't think he is that
>sensitive. Julio's comment in no way can be described as an ins
[was: Re: [PEN-L:13739] Re: Re: Re: Calling an end to S. Africa thread?]
I see nothing wrong with Julio's assertion. He didn't say that Louis was a
bad person or had bad intentions or anything like that. He didn't
_characterize_ Louis' opinions at all. All he did was make an assertion of
_fact
11 matches
Mail list logo
