Re: pomo again (response to Jim)

2000-09-08 Thread Charles Brown
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/08/00 01:34AM >> truth is partisan (to the working class), (( CB: Hear , hear ! My kind of epistemology. And as Maurice Cornforth says in _Materialism and the Dialectical Method_ "Every philosophy expresses a class outlook. But in contrast to th

Re: pomo again (response to Jim)

2000-09-07 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
>Jim Devine wrote, > > >. . . postmoderns reject a basic principle of science, the view that > > there's more to reality than what's in your head ("your > > reality"). There's something outside that we're trying to discover. I'd > > have to do a survey of the postmoderns to see how common it is, b

Re: pomo again (response to Jim)

2000-09-07 Thread Timework Web
Jim Devine wrote, >. . . postmoderns reject a basic principle of science, the view that > there's more to reality than what's in your head ("your > reality"). There's something outside that we're trying to discover. I'd > have to do a survey of the postmoderns to see how common it is, but my > ex

Re: Pomo, again! (response to Jim)

2000-09-07 Thread michael
Justin is correct. I still see a handfull of people still interested in this subject. > > In a message dated 9/7/00 9:41:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << [after this message, this discussion will be off-list, given Michael > Perelman's preferences.] >> > > I d

Pomo, again! (response to Jim)

2000-09-07 Thread JKSCHW
In a message dated 9/7/00 9:41:28 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << [after this message, this discussion will be off-list, given Michael Perelman's preferences.] >> I don't seewhy. There are a lot of people who are interested in the questions being discussed here, even i

Re: Pomo, again! (response to Jim)

2000-09-07 Thread Jim Devine
[after this message, this discussion will be off-list, given Michael Perelman's preferences.] Nico writes: >But, what I am saying is that what any of us say is only an opinion. And >there is no possible assertion of truth when truth changes depending on >where you are in history and who you s

Re: Pomo, again! (response to Jim)

2000-09-06 Thread JKSCHW
In a message dated 9/6/00 7:34:32 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << But, what I am saying is that what any of us say is only an opinion. And there is no possible assertion of truth when truth changes depending on where you are in history and who you study with and what yo

Pomo, again! (response to Jim)

2000-09-06 Thread Nicole Seibert
Jim writes: Anyone who embraces such a view is saying that their statements are simply opinion, a bunch of subjective feelings, with no assertion of possible truth. So there's no reason to respect those opinions. I'll ignore them. My response: But, what I am saying is that what any of us say is