I am looking at some data on military spending.  The War Resister's
League (WRL) and the Center for Defense Information (CDI) both put out
estimates of military spending.  The WRL includes dod, part of doe,
international security, and 1/2 of NASA in what they call current
military spending.  They also include veterans benefits and 80% of the
total interest on the national debt in a category they call past
military spending.  They compare this to Total Federal Outlays minus
what they call the trust funds which is money collected primarily for
social security and medicare.

CDI makes their defense spending calculation in a similar manner execpt
they appear to use 50% of the net interest payments rather than 80% of
total interest payments.  They then look at military spending as a
portion of discretionary spending.

First question:

The 50% v. 80% is no big deal from a methodological perspective.
However, using the total interest v. net interest is important.  It
seems to me that CDI is correct in using net interest since much of the
interest the Federal Gov't actually pays is to Federal agencies.  Isn't
the relevant interest on the national debt the net interest paid on the
privately held debt?

Second question:

If you are going to compare defense spending to discretionary spending
shouldn't you exclude the net interest payments since they are a form of
mandatory spending?  It also seems to me that you should exclude that
portion of veterans benefits that are mandatory spending.

Third question:

I think that the WRL's rationale for excluding social security and
medicare spending paid for by premiums and payroll taxes from total
outlays is that this money has been designated for use by law for these
programs.  These programs used to be off budget but were added to the so
called unified federal budget during the Johnson Administration to make
military spending look like it is a smaller part of the budget.  Does
this make sense?

I have been on vacation and have reactivated my subscription to pen-l
but in case there is a problem could you please cc me a private copy of
any response.

Thanks

Rudy

Reply via email to