Jim Devine wrote: << checking out the British Labour Party on the web, they
seem to have dropped the red flag as their symbol (replacing it with a red
rose -- with thorns?) but not the red flag anthem. >>
Michael Keaney wrote: << This change occurred under Neil Kinnock's
leadership, c. 1985. T
Jim Devine wrote:
checking out the British Labour Party on the web, they seem to have dropped
the red flag as their symbol (replacing it with a red rose -- with thorns?)
but not the red flag anthem.
=
This change occurred under Neil Kinnock's leadership, c. 1985. There was a
minor stir at
>Margaret Coleman wrote:
> > Good one, Gene, but I was refering to the nineteenth century
>labor song "Bread and
>> Roses." It was the hook of a song sung by laboring women who said they were
>> fighting not just for bread, but for roses too--as in more than
>>basic subsistence.
> > If I co
Margaret Coleman wrote:
>
> Good one, Gene, but I was refering to the nineteenth century labor song "Bread and
> Roses." It was the hook of a song sung by laboring women who said they were
> fighting not just for bread, but for roses too--as in more than basic subsistence.
> If I could remembe
Good one, Gene, but I was refering to the nineteenth century labor song "Bread and
Roses." It was the hook of a song sung by laboring women who said they were
fighting not just for bread, but for roses too--as in more than basic subsistence.
If I could remember all the lyrics, I would put them do
War of the Roses again?
I'm betting on York.
Gene Coyle
Margaret Coleman wrote:
> Bread and Roses?? maggie
>
> Jim Devine wrote:
>
> > checking out the British Labour Party on the web, they seem to have dropped
> > the red flag as their symbol (replacing it with a red rose -- with thorns?)
Bread and Roses?? maggie
Jim Devine wrote:
> checking out the British Labour Party on the web, they seem to have dropped
> the red flag as their symbol (replacing it with a red rose -- with thorns?)
> but not the red flag anthem.
>
> Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jde
checking out the British Labour Party on the web, they seem to have dropped
the red flag as their symbol (replacing it with a red rose -- with thorns?)
but not the red flag anthem.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
t;
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:15 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:13787] Re: Re: Re: red flags
> No, and the Russians haven't taken Lenin's tomb out of Red Square, either.
> --jks
>
> >
> >At 02:36 PM 6/21/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >>BTW, the JCP's [Japanese Co
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Devine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:04 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:13786] Re: Re: red flags
> At 02:36 PM 6/21/01 -0400, you wrote:
> >BTW, the JCP's [Japanese Communist Party's] daily newsp
No, and the Russians haven't taken Lenin's tomb out of Red Square, either.
--jks
>
>At 02:36 PM 6/21/01 -0400, you wrote:
>>BTW, the JCP's [Japanese Communist Party's] daily newspaper is still
>>called Akahata [Red Flag], even though it ceased to be revolutionary a
>>long time ago
>
>has the Bri
At 02:36 PM 6/21/01 -0400, you wrote:
>BTW, the JCP's [Japanese Communist Party's] daily newspaper is still
>called Akahata [Red Flag], even though it ceased to be revolutionary a
>long time ago
has the British Labour Party dropped its "red flag" anthem?
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://
Jim says:
>[was: Re: [PEN-L:13751] Re: Re: Angel of History (was Re: Geras vs Laclau)]
>
>Justin writes:
>>You don't have to call yourself a Marxist, wave red flags, talk the
>>language of early 20th century Russian political organizing, to be
>>a socialist. In
[was: Re: [PEN-L:13751] Re: Re: Angel of History (was Re: Geras vs Laclau)]
Justin writes:
>You don't have to call yourself a Marxist, wave red flags, talk the
>language of early 20th century Russian political organizing, to be a
>socialist. In fact, it's probably best no
14 matches
Mail list logo
