Gene writes:
>None of these problems existed when we all did our analysis in Latin.
Satis verborum.
Pro Marxismus sine stercore tauri,
Gilbertus Skillmanus
>Doug writes, in response to my post,
>
>>So is the added value of the non-prose part of chaos theory inexpressible
>>in prose? Are we talking, like, radical incommensurability here?
>
>
>No, mostly precision and concision. An analogy: in the latest issue of
>Doug's Left Business Observer, as is
Doug writes, in response to my post,
>So is the added value of the non-prose part of chaos theory inexpressible
>in prose? Are we talking, like, radical incommensurability here?
No, mostly precision and concision. An analogy: in the latest issue of
Doug's Left Business Observer, as is the case
Gil Skillman wrote:
>Well, the paragraph of English prose can't really "make this point just
>fine", in the sense of really knowing what the point means, what it
>necessitates, and what it rules out. Prose is best suited for indicating
>possibilities and connections, perhaps allusively. It's mu
