Jim Devine wrote:
>I think the main impact of the InfoRev has been decentralization.
Except that there was a tremendous exodus of corporate HQ from New York and
other big cities in the 1960s and 1970s, an exodus that has now largely
ended. And we're seeing a tremendous gentrification of old urba
Brad De Long wrote:
>>Are they using "real" growth here? Given the big drop in hardware prices,
>>small nominal growth can turn into giant real growth when deflated (or, in
>>this case, inflated).
>>
>>Doug
>
>They are real numbers. But they are (or are supposed to be) chained to
>minimize this p
Brad De Long wrote:
>The point is that if you are doing neoclassical utilitarian economics
>correctly, you don't make the mistake of confusing social welfare with GDP
>per capita.
If you don't do that, then is it still neoclassical economics?
Doug
Rod Hay wrote:
>Personal computers have been with us for twenty years. Have they engendered
>any discernible trends in social evolution?
Yeah, we're talking to each other, for one.
Doug
Peter Dorman wrote:
>Yes, and I'm peeved. The last sentence was the important one, making
>the main political point (about democracy) and needling the Times for
>the implicit bias in their coverage. *They never received my permission
>to print this revised version.*
They always do this. They c
Rod Hay wrote:
>One can interpret the Arrow-Debreu model as the ultimate undermining
>of neoclassical general equilibrium. By showing the conditions that
>are required to reach an equilibrium, they demonstrate that it is
>extremely unlikely to occur in any actual economy. (The necessity
>for
Jim Devine wrote:
>Doug writes: >But most neoclassicals respond to this by saying that the
>world is close enough to the theory, and that where the real world differs
>from theory, the real world should be changed to match the dictates
>of theory.<
>
>isn't the latter the main program of the IM
Carrol Cox wrote:
>Reference Doug's post on Zizek on Ideology.
>
>This is defining one use of the word. Clearly there are not enough words
>
>in English to confine any word to one usage. The word "ideology" will
>often have to be used in senses different from or even contradictory to
>the sense(s
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>I agree that neoclassical economics is both a complex of ideas and a
>material practice, but I think that neoclassical economics isn't the
>'spontaneous' understanding of the world without qualifications. Not
>everything solid melts into thin air, when it comes to gender,
Quite an interesting practice, responding to people who aren't here.
Doug
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>I've taken a look at the exchange on race on lbo, and it is quite
>interesting to see what appears to be unintended effects of whiteness
>studies. Three fragments on whiteness from lbo:
>
>*
>
Brad De Long wrote:
>... and is likely to remain racist for a long time to come--unless
>America's left can unify and organize...
I just read a quote attributed to Ronald Reagan, of all people, in
today's paper. He said that someone who agrees with you 80% of the
time isn't your enemy. Maybe
Henry C.K. Liu wrote:
>Note the tactic of shifting the issue to one of protocol rather than
>substance.
>The way you said it, Yosjie, is ungentlewoman like, therefore what
>true.
This is utter crap, Henry. I never tried to stop discussion of race
on lbo-talk; the only thing I wanted to stop w
Louis Proyect wrote:
>In some ways,
>Chomsky with his blend of anarchism and libertarianism is less timid than
>the averaged tenured Marxist professor. They have been trained to write in
>a lofty, non-judgemental manner about history and economics, but rarely in
>the exhortative manner found in C
Louis Proyect wrote:
>that is the time
>you choose to allow them to reprint your LBO musings on the left and its
>problems.
Actually James Heartfield asked me to write the article for LM. It
wasn't a reprint of anything.
Pathogenetically,
Doug
By the way, here's the piece I wrote for LM that made Lou Proyect
sick. This is what I sent them; there may have been minor edits in
the published version.
Doug
IN LOVE WITH DISASTER
by Doug Henwood
Back in 1992, I wrote an article in the newsletter I edit
<http://www.p
jf noonan wrote:
>For those of us not up on the diabolical machinations of
>crypto-facist Henwood, what publication are you talking about?
LM, formerly known as Living Marxism, the former publication of the
former Revolutionary Communist Party (the British one, no relation to
Bob Avakian's cul
Louis Proyect wrote:
> >quoth Doug, from LBO #90, which I received today:
> >>One of the depressing things about this war [against Serbia] is all the
> >side-taking that's been going on.
>
>Well, of course Doug would write something like this. He is a journalist
>above the fray.
And where are yo
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>Yes, but the majority of women are, alas, not feminists, bourgeois or
>otherwise.
Though they do pay allegiance to "equal pay for equal work."
>Isn't the very fact that race still matters (despite many non-white
>persons' passionate desire for inclusion + equal exploit
Rob Schaap wrote:
>Ý* Computer technology has revolutionized the way
>Ýprivate industry manages the flow of products and
>Ýmaterials. Disruptive pile-ups of unused goods and
>Ýbottlenecks caused by shortages--historically major
>Ýcauses of economic instability--appear to be less of a
>Ýthreat the
Brad De Long wrote:
>>Brad is right that very good, very intelligent neo-classical
>>economist attempt to separate the technique from the ideology. I
>>don't think that they are completely successful.
>
>
>I would agree--there is an elective affinity between "classical
>liberal" politics and t
Jim Devine quoted :
>
> Is it a freak, the economic equivalent
> of a 100-year flood? A growing number
> of experts think not.
>
> Not only will today's good times roll
> longer than ever before, according to this
> view, but the traditional cycle of boom
> and bust will never be the same again.
>
Henry C.K. Liu wrote:
>REPORT: 2 CHINESE VICTIMS IN U.S. RAID IN BELGRADE REPORTEDLY WERE SPIES
>
>Two of the three Chinese killed in last month's Chinese Embassy bombing in
>Belgrade were not journalists -- but intelligence officers!
>
>So claims a report in late editions of Friday's NEW YORK TI
Rod Hay wrote:
>My question is whether in this decentralization the corporation as we know
>it can persist. Can the centre hold? It depends upon the control of property
>(material or otherwise). Will corporations have any advantage?
We can speculate all we like on the future, but the present & r
Rod Hay wrote:
>I don't doubt that these things are happening at least marginally, but does
>this constitute a "revolution" similar in importance as the industrial
>revolution in the 19th century or the corporate revolution in the 20th
>century.
Computers are over 50 years old now; they're no lo
Craven, Jim wrote:
>BTW, I heard, but do not know, that for some time Summers did not deny
>having written that memo and then later claimed he did not write it but it
>was a memo of understanding to what was discussed and then the story changed
>again to "I didn't write it and had nothing to do w
By the way, in a neglected passage of the Summers/Pritchett memo, it says:
What's new? Throughout the outline I struggle with the evidence showing
what exactly the proclaimed revolution [in production] has revolutionized.
FDI has always existed and many of the world's largest firms have been
tra
re
is less depressing than I imagined before reading this.
By the way, the poll was done by a bipartisan team, Geoffrey Garin
of Peter D. Hart Associates (Dem) and Linda DiVall of American Viewpoint
(Rep).
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
rement, Determinants, and Monetary
Policy Implications (BIS Economic Papers No. 40, April 1994).
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
You're probably thinking of Transforming the US Financial System, edited
by Gary Dymski, Gerald Epstein, and Robert Pollin, published by ME Sharpe
for the Economic Policy Institute.
My book. I gotta finish it first.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874
a positive development model to replace them. Are traditional
ways of life to be preserved forever? Is electrification a bad thing in
itself? In other words, what should be done in place of the dams?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
ad
very little along those lines.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Thu, 9 Jun 1994, Ben Crow wrote:
> Andrew Sessions has posted the 'Manibeli Declaration', a proposal from the
> International Rivers Network,
;s
finance ministry interrupted to say - you have no idea what it's like to
be a finance minister who has to come up with $100m in foreign exchange
next week. Does any of the works you cited - and I'll check them out on
my own as soon as I can - address this problem?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[E
ry's
forever, or is this just a transitional strategy?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
I'd be happy to sign this, but only if the spelling of Caterpillar is
corrected. I suspect my affiliation may scare the UAW a bit though.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Sat, 11 Jun 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found out when my mail was returned as
undeliverable.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
nomist's - are all telling very similar tales.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Sat, 18 Jun 1994, Michael Perelman wrote:
> I am double posting this to pen-l and pkt since I would like to draw upon
> the collective
n't tend quite
forcefully towards concentration. It seems that lots of these New Visions
are merely old populist, petit bourgeois, small business, Proudhonist
fantasies in new guise.
Yay! Thank God someone finally spoke up for rootless cosmopolitans. Some
of us find these small scale, lo
s and transfers as well as before_ is far more
unequal than Western Europe's, and probably is the most unequal in the First
World. The IMF is trafficking in fantasy.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Mon, 20 Jun 199
incorporation of the ANC guerillas into the army).
Is there a South African Bob Woodward?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
he FT said "It comes as a surprise to see an ANC government handong
out goodies to the corporate sector but not to the masses."
The JSE liked the budget, as did Buthelezi.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On T
Calling Vaclav Havel a "sententious faker" is one of many reasons why you
gotta love Cockburn.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
ate tax an illusion?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Thu, 23 Jun 1994, Jim Devine wrote:
> In South Africa,
> "The corporate tax was cut from 40% to 35%, though this was
> partly offset by an increase from
zine's BBS, which is still
in formation, and requires direct dialup.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Sat, 25 Jun 1994, Bill Humphries wrote:
> I understand _The Nation_ maintains a presence on PeaceNet, but are
50/50 between capital and labor. In their recent work, like the paper
analyzing the Clinton tax changes published in January, An Economic
Analysis of the Revenue Provisions of OBRA-93, they applied the corporate
tax 100% to personal income from capital.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Bus
professed surpise herself.
2) US corporate taxes higher? Now *there's* a counterfactual!
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
investment
income fell to virtually zero last year - for the first time since before
the First World War.
They might have added that as recently as 1990, the figure was +$20.3b.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
y good out-of-the-mainstream explanations of hyperinflation?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
es it just lend a priestly aura?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Tue, 5 Jul 1994, carla feldpausch wrote:
> On hyperinflation, if you look at the modeling that John Holland is doing on
> speculative bubbles in the
I thought folks might be interested in this little polemic, which will
appear in tomorrow's (Jul 8) Financial Times letters column.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
PS: The sexist "Sir" isn't my ch
cipatory desire, it is necesary to insist
on it more than ever, it seems, and insist on it, moreover, as the very
indestructibility of the 'it is necessary.' This is the condition of a
repoliticization, perhaps of another concept of the political
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTE
Is there no room for non-women and non-academics in such a statement?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
sy equivalences of right=racist and multiculti=progressive must be
rethought, no question mark following.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Tue, 19 Jul 1994, Blair Sandler wrote:
> Doug Henwood wrote about today's WSJ article on the Christian
> Coalition.
>
> "They want to become, says organizer Ralph Reed, a true rainbow
> coalition. This means that the easy equivalences of right=racist
> and mu
tuation in practical political terms.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Tue, 19 Jul 1994, Julie Matthaei wrote:
> Reading the suggested texts on Marx and Engels' critiques of utopian
> socialism brings to mind my
ed by the day. Of course our message and our program need
rethinking and retuning, but dilution gets you nowhere.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
t of the damage, not the overpopulated
countries of the south.
I also wish folks would tend more towards viewing human beings as a
resource rather than a threat.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
y increase the man-years of
human misery, ultimately from starvation," wrote King. Kill them to be
kind.
[For info on CounterPunch, write to CounterPunch, c/o Institute for Policy
Studies, 1601 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington DC 20009, or call
202-234-9382.]
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
After reading that count, whatever the errors Gil points out, I've taken
a vow of silence.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
7 votes is
almost a mass appeal, no?
Now if I could just think of something to say
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Fri, 9 Sep 1994, Cotter_Cindy wrote:
> When I was a kid I attended a performance of Peter Pan in w
itiques of Coase's theorem of why firms exist? Relatedly, are there any
Marxian theories of the firm?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
)satisfaction, etc. A press release reporting the results will be
available in the summer of 1995 and a full report, probably in the
Monthly Labor Review, in the fall of 1995.
There is currently no reliable data on contingent work in the U.S.; this
will be the first.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED
How do you begin to encourage cooperation and a social conscience in a
society that is hostile to those ideas? Don't you have a chicken/egg
problem here?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Mon, 19 Sep 1994, Jim D
are
long Telmex and the Singapore Fund - call your broker!
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
The Women's Statement is a fine document. Should there a be a similar men's
statement? Or do men only concern themselves with macro issues like
fiscal policy and trade?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
This may be bad. But is it nonsense?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Wed, 28 Sep 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Herewith El Kruger:
>Reports by international organizations are usually greeted with well
>
I assume that mainstreamers who blame technology never acknowledge that
R&D is financed by capital and capital's state, and that it's part of the
strategy to cheapen labor? It's just the innocent at the party?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
What is the point of the coupons if you can't trade them? Are they just a
bookkeeping device for distributing profits? Or is there some sentimental
attachment to stock certificates? I thought everything was book entry
these days. Book entry socialism?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROT
when the NYT front-pages it?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
e=LBO
Path=1/econ/orgs/LBO
Host=csf.Colorado.EDU
Port=70
Admin=Studly Gopher Admin +1 (612) 338-3970 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ModDate=Sun Oct 2 17:26:17 1994 <19941002172617>
URL: gopher://csf.Colorado.EDU:70/1/1/econ/orgs/LBO
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
21
It's indeed sad to hear Mandela say this, but what choices do small poor
countries have these days? If you, or any of us, were given the task of
devising a development strategy for SA, or Brazil, or Sri Lanka - what
would we do?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Obs
FYI.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 04 Oct 94 06:22 PDT
From: The Development GAP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Recipients of conference mlist.wbbig" <[EMAIL
On Wed, 5 Oct 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> By the way, does this rant count as an example of the "populism" that I've
> seen criticized in various circles (not here) of late?
Is World Bank-bashing merely populist? I hope not
What do you mean, Ian?
Doug
mething of a liberal; he supports some enviro and
pop contol causes (excluding tobacco). But the pig once refused to give
his daughter a dime when she was unemployed and living in a trailer park.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (
The power of financial capital moves with, or in the opposite direction
of, retained earnings?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Thu, 6 Oct 1994, Michael Perelman wrote:
> I have just completed a book in which I find t
The makeup of this group speaks volumes.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 1994 11:47-0400
From: The White House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
o email a copy (about 97K) to anyone who asks.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
ated capital so as to avoid a debt crisis and
avoid pricing itself out of world markets? And how did it get away with
this in the political sense? Why didn't the US pry them open earlier?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
Bank press office to explain these oddities, but they
haven't responded yet.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
It's Business Executives for National Security. Don't know where they
are, but no doubt the Encyclopedia of Associations does.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Mon, 10 Oct 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
&
Final offer to have the US Census Bureau's income & poverty reports for
1993 emailed to you. I'm gonna purge the file on Friday morning, NYC time.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
Is there any room in game theory for power - political, market, or
class? Or is it just a game among equals and individuals?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
Yes, please.
Many things are happening in Decatur now, right? Please keep us posted.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Sat, 15 Oct 1994, Robert Naiman wrote:
>
> Would folks be interested in updates on the Staley l
t in vol. 3 of Capital, or the
chapter on money in the Grundrisse. Not exactly policy-relevant, of course.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Mon, 17 Oct 1994 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear John,
> For a critical p
There's a C Payer listed in my Manhattan phone book who I'm pretty sure
is Cheryl. 212-255-2957, 13 Carmine St.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Mon, 17 Oct 1994, Robert Naiman wrote:
>
> Anyone out t
should govern immigration to the US?
The issue seems complex, dangerous, and trivialized in mainstream discussion.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
ious discussion.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Wed, 19 Oct 1994, Robert Naiman wrote:
> Surely the issue is the fact that the undocumented workers have no
> rights. If the bosses have access to a group of worke
They passed, and Bill signed them with enthusiasm.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Wed, 19 Oct 1994, Brian Eggleston wrote:
> Pen-lers
>
> Does anyone have information on the fate of the interstate branch
>
Thanks to Nathan Newman for posting his article. That was exactly the
sort of thing I was looking for.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
It seems that everyone these days accepts the Hayek critique of planning.
Are there any sharp new critiques of the critiques that the comrades
could recommend?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
stand why someone would lapse into the "wouldn't it be neat
if...?" mode, but it's not very helpful on how to get from here to there.
Transforming what exists seems to me to be the way to go, and what exists
is lots of markets, and what we need is less of them.
Doug
Doug
Duh, I dunno. I ain't taken no vow of no silence, but I dunno. Guess I've
been watching too much Beavis and Butt-head.
Call Larry Lindsay at the Fed!
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
On Thu, 27 Oct 1994 [EMAIL
red.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
I think my system screwed up and bounced a message as user unknown and
de-subscribed me. Am I desubscribed?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
e forms of education and health, and low fertility rates.
Anyone know what research Barro is referring to? Is it credible?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
FYI. - Doug Henwood
Original message
The following are comments of the president of the ETS on misinterpretation
and abuse of data sets by the authors of Bell Curve:
-- Forwarded message --
Subject: Re: IQ, genetics, and
Apologies for both the vulgar self-promotion and possible duplicate
postings! Please feel free to repost, redistribute, tack on telephone
polls, shout from rooftops, etc.
Doug Henwood
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024
212-874-4020 phone
212-874-3137 fax
the catcalls.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
Comrades, do not exaggerate your despair. The share of the Congressional
popular vote was 52% Rep, 48% Dem. This hardly qualifies as the landslide
of reaction it's been portrayed as - especially given depressed turnout
on the left and energized turnout on the right.
Doug
Doug Henwood [[
of financial
orthodoxy on the U.S. scene. Are the Danish funds managed according to
social principles or according to orthodox share price maximization?
Doug
Doug Henwood [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Left Business Observer
212-874-4020 (voice)
212-874-3137 (fax)
ith any of this? It's about as bland as the usual politician's
bleating about change. Where's that fundamental rethink of basic
institutions that Rogers and Pope called for in their Nation manifesto?
One might suspect they're pitching for the same Perotians that Clinton
is,
601 - 700 of 4124 matches
Mail list logo
