Doug Henwood said:
. . . any Marxist writers on the r.c. . . . [?]
Query whether Frederick Vanderbilt Field's autobiographical and political
musings - e.g., From Right to Left (Lawrence Hill Co. and Chicago
Review Press) - would qualify?
On 3/12/07, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
It would be interesting if someone attempted a theory of imperialism
that mediates socio-economic forces and structures with
psychological structures of the ruling class and the power elite. I
think Sartre once criticized Marxist theory for neglecting to
On 3/12/07, Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have long criticized Marxism for ignoring psychology (though such
worthies as Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse should be mentioned).
Jim Devine / The truth is more important than the facts. -- Frank Lloyd Wright
lists are always incomplete,
I agree
On 3/12/07, Michael Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/12/07, Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have long criticized Marxism for ignoring psychology (though such
worthies as Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse should be mentioned).
Jim Devine / The truth is more important than
Dear Friends,
I am not so sure about the link between psychology and marxism but there is
growing literature on the intersection between psychoanalysis and marxism
from the side of the psychoanalysis. With my co-author Ceren Ozselcuk, we
have recently embarked upon bridging the gap from the
On 3/12/07, Michael Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/12/07, Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have long criticized Marxism for ignoring psychology (though such
worthies as Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse should be mentioned).
Jim Devine / The truth is more important than the facts.
On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:13 PM, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
Strange as it may seem, the Marxist tradition has not paid much
attention to the ruling classes and power elites as they actually
exist.
A few months ago, when I told Bertell Ollman that I was working on a
book about the ruling class, which
On 3/12/07, Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 12, 2007, at 6:13 PM, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
Strange as it may seem, the Marxist tradition has not paid much
attention to the ruling classes and power elites as they actually
exist.
A few months ago, when I told Bertell Ollman that I
don't you man the ruling elite, not the ruling class?
how about G. William Domhoff? Tom Bottomore has a nice little book on
_Elites and Society_, BTW. The original elite theories came from folks
like Pareto and Mosca, who were pretty conservative.
On 3/12/07, Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G. William Domhoff
http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/
On 3/12/07, Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
don't you man the ruling elite, not the ruling class?
how about G. William Domhoff? Tom Bottomore has a nice little book on
_Elites and Society_, BTW. The original elite theories
10 matches
Mail list logo
