I was just looking at an article on MaxSpeak by Tom Walker regarding spam. It
raises
the question for me. Advertising is considered legitimate enterprise. Spam is
not.
Pop-up ads are considered legitimate. Lots of advertising annoys me. What is
the
difference between spam and advertising?
for some reason, when I look at the Spam file on g-mail (Google Mail),
Google gives me a link to recipes that involve the use of Spam. Is it
Google that has the sense of humor? or Hormel, the makers of Spam?
--
Jim Devine / "There can be no real individual freedom in the presence
of economic insecu
New Yorker Magazine
Annals of Technology
Damn Spam
The losing war on junk e-mail.
by Michael Specter August 6, 2007
In the spring of 1978, an energetic marketing man named Gary Thuerk
wanted to let people in the technology world know that his company, the
Digital Equipment Corporation, was abou
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Perelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I was just looking at an article on MaxSpeak by Tom Walker regarding spam.
It raises
the question for me. Advertising is considered legitimate enterprise.
Spam is not.
Pop-up ads are considered legitimate. Lots of adverti
What is the difference between spam and advertising?
advertising = A
spam = S
capital = C
A - S = C
In terms of direct contribution to the GDP, the difference is about $200
billion a year. Plus, advertising would have a far heftier multiplier.
Thomas Carlyle had a delightful vignette in Past an
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [PEN-L] spam
> What is the difference between spam and advertising?
>
> advertising = A
> spam = S
> capital = C
>
Michael Perelman writes: > Advertising is considered legitimate enterprise.
Spam is not.
Pop-up ads are considered legitimate. Lots of advertising annoys me. What is
the
difference between spam and advertising?<
one thing is that ads on TV are often seen as the "price" of broadcast TV,
which
Why do you think traditional ads would have a higher multiplier? Also, with
respect
to Jim's comment, cost of the ads on tv or in the paper are passed on to
purchasers,
who become convinced that Tom W.'s hat has more utils.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:06:50AM -0800, Tom Walker wrote:
> What i
I'm playing fast and loose with the term 'multiplier'. In this case, I'm not
just thinking of the economic activity that results from spending the
revenues generated by advertising but I have in mind both the purposes of
the advertising to stimulate greater purchasing (at higher prices) and also
in
Sounds more like tax burden than multiplier.
>I'm playing fast and loose with the term 'multiplier'. In this case, I'm not
>
>just thinking of the economic activity that results from spending the
>revenues generated by advertising but I have in mind both the purposes of
>the advertising to stimula
Robert Gassler wrote,
Sounds more like tax burden than multiplier.
Yes, it is like a tax, especially since the programming is carried on public airwaves under licence from the state.
The Sacramento Bee published an article on Nigerian scam aritists today bu Dulue
Mbachu. It is not on their web site.
The auther goes & talks with the scammers, who seem to be well educated young
men who
cannot get jobs, suggesting once again the relationship between unemployment &
social
ills.
At around 15/3/06 12:47 pm, Jim Devine wrote:
> for some reason, when I look at the Spam file on g-mail (Google Mail),
> Google gives me a link to recipes that involve the use of Spam. Is it
> Google that has the sense of humor? or Hormel, the makers of Spam?
> --
I doubt its Hormel -- they sued t
But, most of the spam emails don't contain that word in their bodies or
titles. Of course, the layout google has for the spam folder contains the
word "spam" a number of times, but I thought the ads were based on the
words contained in the actual emails.
> I doubt its Hormel -- they sued to prote
At around 15/3/06 5:25 pm, Walt Byars wrote:
> But, most of the spam emails don't contain that word in their bodies or
> titles. Of course, the layout google has for the spam folder contains the
> word "spam" a number of times, but I thought the ads were based on the
> words contained in the actua
Today, I discovered that G-mail's "Trash" folder includes "tips on
recycling" such as "You can make a lovely hat out of previously-used
aluminum foil."
This suggests that the spam recipes in G-mail's spam folder are G-mail's joke.
On 3/15/06, ravi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At around 15/3/06 5:
speaking of unemployment, the problem of the oversupply of educated
(male) workers relative to demand in poor countries is also a
contributing cause to the rise of terrorism in the Arab world,
Pakistan, Indonesia, etc.
On 8/7/05, Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to be a nice
Absolutely! But not just terrorism, but fundamentalism. Just as in the US, I
suspect that the bifurcated economy has contributed to the rise of religion.
The
winners think that God has chosen them; the losers seek refuge. So much for my
brief
foray into sociology!
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 10:
On 8/7/05, Michael Perelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely! But not just terrorism, but fundamentalism. Just as in the US, I
> suspect that the bifurcated economy has contributed to the rise of religion.
> The
> winners think that God has chosen them; the losers seek refuge. So much f
Doug Henwood trolls Yoshie:
On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
I posted an interesting NYT article on China's rising production costs
(stagflation, anyone?), a new study (the first of its kind?), by
economist Robert Kaestner, on the impact of anti-Arab/anti-Muslim
prejudice on
20 matches
Mail list logo