2010/7/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
Hello,
I'd like to sent Draft for packaging guidelines for review. There were
added some changes a long time ago and it would be nice to have it
official. If there won't be any comments, I'll sent it at the end of
next week to comitee.
The
Author: tremble
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-namespace-clean/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31599
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-namespace-clean.spec sources
Log Message:
Update from rawhide prior to initial build
Index: .cvsignore
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 03:46:25PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
The draft: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDraft:Perl
It would be great to have a review from someone who has English as first
language.
What about perl module versioning? There is well-known schism in CPAN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967
--- Comment #6 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2010-07-27 04:24:25 EDT ---
IO::Compress 2.030 built.
--
Configure bugmail:
On 27/07/10 07:50, Iain Arnell wrote:
Since we no longer have perl version numbers in @INC, I think the
whole Directory Ownership section should be updated to reflect the
current situation. With a few simple examples. Maybe something like:
In general, perl's hierarchical naming convention for
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
2010/7/27 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 07/27/2010 08:50 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
2010/7/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
Hello,
I'd like to sent Draft for packaging guidelines for review. There were
added some changes a long time ago and it would be nice to have it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617967
--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2010-07-27 14:17:13 EDT ---
IO::Compress::Lzma now built; you can now prepare
On 07/27/2010 06:49 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
Maybe we should also consider splitting perl-sig mailing list into
separate perl-sig-bug-and-cvs-spam and a real discussion list.
Please no.
a) We already have way too many lists in Fedora.
b) perl-sig members already receive many duplicate mails
* Ralf Corsepius [28/07/2010 07:25] :
Please no.
+1
Having a single address where everything perl related gets sent to is a
valuable asset. I'ld rather we not lose that.
Emmanuel
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
10 matches
Mail list logo