https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962451
Bug ID: 1962451
Summary: perl-perlfaq-5.20210520 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-perlfaq
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962200
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1962200
Bug ID: 1962200
Summary: Merge PR #1
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-Taint
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
Reporter: tbae...@red
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Archive-Extract`
that you are following:
``
Create EPEL8 package
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Archive-Extract/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961865
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Hoger ---
Correct, that's why no bugs were filed against Fedora / EPEL. Thanks for
noting that explicitly!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961865
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth ---
perl-Net-CIDR-Lite is already updated to version 0.22 in all current Fedora and
EPEL releases.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960969
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207174
--- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar ---
Good catch. It's true that there is no "close($second)" call in the parent
(server) process.
But all sockets are implicitly closed on a process exit. That means that the
reproducer cannot
accumulate open soc
ppisar merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-FFI-CheckLib` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-FFI-CheckLib/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedorap
