https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius ---
perl-Moo-1.006000 also depends on perl(Module::Runtime) >= 0.014
=> For now, we will have let rot perl-Moo in Fedora < f21
It's a shame for Fedora having to expose users to known bugs.
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ---
Moo-1.006000 breaks perl-MooX-Types-MooseLike tests. The stack trace changed
since Moo-1.00500, whose output is parsed by the test:
# Failed test 'The error looks like a useful stacktrace'
# at t/basic.t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
--- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3)
> Common sense and Fedora update guidelines. Just that your few packages does
> crash does not mean there is no change in behavior F19 or F20 users can
> depend on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3 from Pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
--- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius ---
Updated on f21 and rawhide.
Does anybody know a reason for not upgrading Moo on f19 and f20?
I did a couple of random rebuilds of packages BR:-ing perl-Moo and so far
haven't found any issues.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131073
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
