[Bug 1469031] Please update perl-Plack version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1469031] Please update perl-Plack version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1469031] Please update perl-Plack version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Plack-1.0033-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-dbdb41f602 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1469031] Please update perl-Plack version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031 --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Okay... Investigating this bug, I found out two things: a) perl-Plack has no owner on the EPEL7 branch. I've reached out to the repo owners and asked for ownership. b) The

[Bug 1469031] Please update perl-Plack version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031 --- Comment #4 from Clément OUDOT --- Is there no possibility to ask for an update of perl-HTTP-Tiny in base? This restriction could lead to bugs with LL::NG 2.0 on CentOS/RHEL. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1469031] Please update perl-Plack version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- perl-Plack 1.0033 requires perl-HTTP-Tiny 0.034 but we have 0.033 in base (and because it's in base, it can't be updated). Unless someone comes up with a great idea, this is a

[Bug 1469031] Please update perl-Plack version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug 1469031] Please update perl-Plack version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469031 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rc040...@freenet.de