commit 134ceba9299a24852434de8b142b22ac0ab1a7f3 Author: Lubomir Rintel <lkund...@fedoraproject.org> Date: Mon Mar 30 19:50:46 2009 +0000
Add mail from upstream LICENSING.mbox | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/LICENSING.mbox b/LICENSING.mbox new file mode 100644 index 0000000..216bffc --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSING.mbox @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +From mar...@rectangular.com Mon Mar 23 01:37:59 2009 +Received: by norkia.v3.sk (Postfix, from userid 99) id 718E880147; Mon, 23 + Mar 2009 01:37:59 +0100 (CET) +X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on norkia.v3.sk +X-Spam-Level: +X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RDNS_NONE autolearn=no + version=3.2.5 +X-Greylist: delayed 2343 by SQLgrey-1.7.5 +Received: from rectangular.com (unknown [68.116.38.202]) (using TLSv1 with + cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by + norkia.v3.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8320C80148 for <lkund...@v3.sk>; Mon, + 23 Mar 2009 00:37:50 +0000 (UTC) +Received: from marvin by rectangular.com with local (Exim 4.63) + (envelope-from <mar...@rectangular.com>) id 1LlXbT-0000Zw-2E for + lkund...@v3.sk; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:01:19 -0700 +Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:01:19 -0700 +To: Lubomir Rintel <lkund...@v3.sk> +Subject: FW: [Re: KinoSearch licensing and Fedora] +Message-ID: <20090323000118.ga2...@rectangular.com> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Disposition: inline +User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) +From: Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> +X-Evolution-Source: imap://lkundrak%40v3...@mail.v3.sk/ +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit + +Lubomir, + +Here you go... + +Marvin Humphrey + +----- Forwarded message from marvin ----- + +To: Ian Burrell <ianburr...@gmail.com> +Subject: Re: KinoSearch licensing and Fedora + +On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 04:21:04PM -0800, Ian Burrell wrote: +> I am trying to package KinoSearch for Fedora. There were some +> questions in the review[1] about the licensing. My understanding is +> that KinoSearch is licensed under the GPL or Aristic. My impression +> is that it doesn't contain any code licensed under ASL 2.0. + +Correct. It is all either original code or derived code, and all licensed +under GPL or Artistic. I've been quite conscientious about never copying and +pasting anything directly from Lucene, including documentation and comments. +That allows me to claim a separate copyright and distribute the project under +different but compatible licensing terms. + +> But that since it was derived from Lucene, it has to include the Apache +> license text. + +That's correct, as per ASL 2.0 section 4.1. + +> Is this right? Is everything in KinoSearch licensed as "GPL+ or +> Artistic"? Does the Apache license need to be included in the binary +> package to satisfy the ASL? + +IANAL but... + +I think so. I've always assumed that derivations/redistributions of +derivations still need to maintain compatibility with the license terms of the +original -- otherwise the original author would quickly lose control of their +work. It seems to me that you need to determine whether the GPLv3 your +derivative work will be distributed under is compatible with both the +KinoSearch license terms (which it obviously is) and the Lucene license terms +-- which ought to be the case so long as you include that file and the +existing notice embedded in the KinoSearch documentation. + +Best, + +Marvin Humphrey + +----- End forwarded message ----- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel