xavierb merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Tk` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Move away from xvfb-run
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Tk/pull-request/4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
xavierb commented on the pull-request: `Move away from xvfb-run` that you are
following:
``
Fine by me then.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Tk/pull-request/4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
nielsdg commented on the pull-request: `Move away from xvfb-run` that you are
following:
``
It's somewhat intentional. We haven't backported the latest version (yet) of
xwayland-run in RHEL 9, which has some slight changes. We _could_ do it, but my
idea was that if xvfb-run works already in
xavierb commented on the pull-request: `Move away from xvfb-run` that you are
following:
``
As `xwayland-run` is available in EPEL 9, I guess the conditional could be
```
0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} >= 9
```
rather than
```
0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 9
```
I'm not sure if this is intentional or a
nielsdg commented on the pull-request: `Move away from xvfb-run` that you are
following:
``
Yeah, we didn't go as far as backporting until EL8.
Updated the spec file to make it conditional
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Tk/pull-request/4
--
xavierb commented on the pull-request: `Move away from xvfb-run` that you are
following:
``
What about EL8 ? From a quick glance xwayland-run doesn't seem to be available
there.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xwayland-run
If that's the case, maybe you could make this conditional ?
``
To
nielsdg opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Tk` that you are
following:
``
Move away from xvfb-run
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Tk/pull-request/4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list --
